Back

No impact of sex on surgical site infections in abdominal surgery: A multi-center study

Zwicky, S. N.; Gloor, S.; Tschan, F.; Candinas, D.; Demartines, N.; Weber, M.; Beldi, G.

2022-03-02 surgery
10.1101/2022.03.01.22271688 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveMale sex is controversially discussed as a risk factor for surgical site infections (SSI). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of sex on SSI in abdominal surgery under elimination of relevant confounders. MethodsClinicopathological data of 6603 patients undergoing abdominal surgery from a multi-center prospective database of four Swiss hospitals including patients between 2015 and 2018 were assessed. Patients were stratified according to postoperative SSI and risk factors for SSI were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. ResultsIn 649 of 6603 patients SSI was reported (9.8%). SSI was significantly associated with reoperation (22.7% vs. 3.4%, p <0.001), higher mortality rate (4.6% vs. 0.9%, p <0.001) and higher rate of length of hospital stay over the 75th percentile (57.0 % vs. 17.9 %, p <0.001). In univariate analysis male sex was a significant risk factor for SSI (p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis including multiple confounders such as comorbidities and perioperative factors there was no association between male sex and risk of SSI (odds ratio (OR) 1.1 [CI 0.8 - 1.4]). Independent risk factors for SSI in multivariate analysis were BMI [&ge;] 30 kg/m2 (OR 1.8 [CI 1.3 - 2.3]), duration of surgery > 75th percentile (OR 2.3 [1.8 - 2.9]), high contamination level (OR 1.3 [1.0 - 1.6]), laparotomy (OR 1.3 [1.0 - 1.7]), pervious laparotomy (OR 1.4 [1.1 - 1.7]), blood transfusion (OR 1.7 [1.2 - 2.4]), cancer (OR 1.3 [1.0-1.8], malnutrition (OR 2.5 [1.8 - 3.4]). ConclusionUnder elimination of relevant confounders there is no significant correlation between sex and risk of SSI after abdominal surgery.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.