Back

Early Childhood Reading for Pleasure: Evidence from the ABCD Study for Benefits to Cognitive Performance and Mental Health and Associated Changes in Brain Structure

Sun, Y.; Sahakian, B. J.; Langley, C.; Yang, A.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, C.; Cheng, W.; Feng, J.

2022-02-28 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.02.27.22271550 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDEarly childhood has increasingly been recognized as an important neurodevelopmental period. However, the links between specific forms of early educational activities and cognition and mental health remain unclear. METHODSA large-scale analysis on the attainments of childhood Reading for Pleasure (early RfP) and its relationship with young adolescent measures of cognition, mental health and brain structure was conducted, using linear mixed-effects model, structural equation and mediation analyses. Participants were from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, a USA national cohort (n=11,878). A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genetic instruments from two independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) based on ABCD and GWAS meta-analyses including UK-biobank datasets were conducted to assess potential causal inference. RESULTSEarly RfP was positively associated with cognitive assessments, which in contrast, was negatively associated with dimensional psychiatric problems in young adolescents. MR analysis revealed a beneficial relationship between early RfP and later-life cognitive performance, and a trend towards a protective relationship between early RfP and later-life attention disorder. Brain regions in which larger cortical areas were positively associated with early RfP included the superior temporal, prefrontal, left angular, parahippocampal, right anterior cingulate (ACC), occipital, supramarginal and orbital regions and subcortical ventral diencephalon (DC), thalamus, and brainstem volumes. Mediation analysis indicated that the brain regions significantly mediated the effects of early RfP with better cognitive performance and lower psychiatric problems. INTERPRETATIONOur results highlight the importance of encouraging RfP in young children during the critical early childhood stage, as it was associated with beneficial outcomes for cognition, mental health, and brain structure later in life.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.2%
2
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
6
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
7
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
8
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
11
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
13
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
14
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
18
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
29
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%