Exercise Training Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Depend on Medications and Disease Conditions: Proposal of SEEM Score to Judge Exercise Suitability
Soejima, Y.; Yoshioka, H.; Guro, S.; Sato, H.; Hatakeyama, H.; Sato, Y.; Fujimoto, Y.; Anzai, N.; Hisaka, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundExercise training is an accepted evidence-based adjunct treatment modality for patients with chronic heart failure. However, the influence of medications or conditions on exercise has not been fully explored. MethodsThe patient records of the Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training (HF-ACTION) study were obtained from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and analyzed by medications used at baseline (renin-angiotensin system inhibitors [RASIs], beta-blockers [BBs], and combination of both) with multivariable Cox regression models focusing on the interactions with exercise effects, and a score to indicate exercise training suitability was proposed accordingly. ResultsMedication type strongly influenced the exercise effect on all-cause death (AD) (P = 0.007) even though medication itself did not change prognosis significantly in HF-ACTION trial. In patients taking both BBs and RASIs at baseline, exercise reduced the AD risk (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.98), whereas in patients not taking BBs, exercise increased the risk (HR, 4.58; 95% CI, 2.90-6.86). The exercise on AD was also influenced by pulse pressure, hemoglobin level, electrocardiography conditions, body mass index, and history of stroke. Accordingly, we constructed the Score for Eligibility of Exercise on Mortality (SEEM). When exercise training was chosen based on SEEM score, both AD and AD and hospitalization (ADH) risks were expected to reduce significantly (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.68; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.93, respectively). ConclusionsExercise training in patients with heart failure should be recommended carefully with consideration of patient background. Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00047437. Trial registration date: 4 October 2002.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 94%
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction: An Overlooked Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmic Events -- A Meta-Analysis 93%
- Mortality Risk and Treatment Disparities in the Chinese SMuRF-less STEMI Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 95%
- Aptamer Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction 94%
- Comparison of Long-term Outcomes of Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment for Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation: A Propensity Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 95%
- High Variability of Body Mass Index Independently Associated with Incident Heart Failure 95%
- The Role of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Managing Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a parsimonious AI-Based Risk Score for Mortality in Heart Failure: A UK cohort study 94%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 93%
- Advanced ECG heart age estimation applicable to both sinus and non-sinus rhythm associates with cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular morbidity, and survival 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.