Back

Evaluating Chinese Handwriting Performance of Primary School Students Using the Smart Handwriting Analysis and Recognition Platform (SHARP)

Li-Tsang, C. W. P.; Li, T. M. H.; Yang, C. N.; Leung, H. W. H.; Zhang, E. W. L.

2022-02-21 pediatrics
10.1101/2022.02.19.22270984 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHandwriting is one of the fundamental skills for school-aged children, and it is an intricate and interacting process. An innovative computerized handwriting assessment system, the Smart Handwriting Analysis and Recognition Platform (SHARP) was used to provide a comprehensive and quantitative analysis of Chinese handwriting performance and identify children with handwriting difficulties objectively, accurately, and efficiently. Aims/ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to provide quantitative data on childrens Chinese handwriting process and products using SHARP; to investigate the handwriting difficulties in children with neurodevelopmental problems, and to explore the associations between handwriting and sensorimotor performance, including fine motor skills, visual perceptual skills, visual-motor integration, and oculomotor proficiency. Material and MethodsTypically developing students and students with neurodevelopmental problems were recruited through teachers and therapists from six primary schools in Hong Kong. SHARP and tests of sensorimotor skills were performed. ResultsThe quantitative analysis using the SHARP system showed a progressive developmental change in handwriting performance among the typically developing children at their primary education. There were also significant differences between the typically developing students group and those with neurodevelopmental problems, both in handwriting speed and writing errors. Significant associations between the handwriting process parameters and fine motor skills were identified, while handwriting product parameters were closely correlated with visual-perceptual skills of these typical developing students. Conclusions and SignificanceSHARP appears to provide a comprehensive, quantitative and objective evaluation of students handwriting performances, thus assisting both teachers and parents in comparing students performance objectively, thus identifying students with handwriting difficulties as early as P1 level. It was observed that handwriting performance has strong relationships with young childrens visual perceptual skills and fine motor skills. The findings could help to facilitate early intervention for those students with handwriting problems.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
38.4%
2
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
7
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
9
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
10
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
11
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
12
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
13
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
15
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%