An Analysis Between Trump's Presidency and Health-Seeking Behaviors of African Americans in the United States
Animasahun, A. A.; Nunez, A. M.; Jean, R. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundSlavery legally ended over 150 years ago, yet African Americans are still oppressed. The lingering effects of systemic and institutional racism are still present in all walks of life, especially in healthcare. As a result, Black patients have historically been less likely to seek preventative care and subsequently, reported lower health outcomes compared to their white counterparts. The election of Donald Trump in 2016 forced a shift in that narrative. This study aimed to investigate whether there was any correlation between changing racial preferences fueled by Trumps racist rhetoric and the health-seeking behaviors of Black patients. Through this, we explored if the number of Black patients that reported not having a primary care physician has changed, and how online search history trends researching Black physicians have also changed. MethodsThis study utilized datasets from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and Google Trends. Pearsons correlation testing was run to establish any correlation between the number of google searches and positive health-seeking behaviors. ResultsGoogleTrends data does support an increased popularity for the search term "black doctor near me" over the years of 2015-2018, supporting our hypothesis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if race, among other variables, was a significant predictor for our predetermined health indicators. The results showed race was significant in nine out of our eleven health indicators. DiscussionDespite decades of work to minimize healthcare disparities, this study has demonstrated how much more still needs to be done. It has shown how the intersection of seemingly unrelated issues, such as politics and health, as described in this study, can drastically impact health outcomes. This study highlights the importance of targeted and equitable programming to ensure quality care for all, that can withstand political and social pressures.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of access to care: A subgroup disparity analysis using new equity-focused measurements 93%
- The Role of Testing Availability on Intentions to Isolate during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Trial 93%
- What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial and ethnic disparities for SARS-CoV-2 positivity in the United States: a generalizing pandemic 93%
- Prevalence and Predictors of Depression among Training Physicians in China: A Comparison to the United States 92%
- Rapid Clinical Screening and Staging for COVID-19 Severe Outcome A Hospitalization Study in New York City 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential Effects of Race/Ethnicity and Social Vulnerability on COVID-19 Positivity, Hospitalization, and Death in the San Francisco Bay Area 94%
- Racial/Ethnic, Biomedical, and Sociodemographic Risk Factors for COVID-19 Positivity and Hospitalization in the San Francisco Bay Area 93%
- Profiles of US Hispanics Unvaccinated for COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccination status among staff and faculty of a large, diverse University in Los Angeles 91%
- COVID-19 booster vaccine attitudes and behaviors among university students and staff: the USC Trojan Pandemic Research Initiative 91%
- Associations of Telemedicine vs. In-Person Ambulatory Care Visits on Cancellation Rates and 30-Day Follow-Up Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementing Select Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Reduce the Transmission of Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2019 91%
- The psychological effects of COVID-19 on frontline healthcare workers and how they are coping: a web-based, cross-sectional study from Pakistan 91%
- SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Potential and Policy Changes in South Carolina, February 2020 – January 2021 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.