Back

Targeted transcutaneous cervical spinal cord stimulation promotes upper limb recovery in spinal cord and peripheral nerve injury

Chandrasekaran, S.; Bhagat, N.; Ramdeo, R.; Ebrahimi, S.; Sharma, P. D.; Stein, A.; Griffin, D.; Harkema, S. J.; Bouton, C.

2022-06-06 neurology
10.1101/2022.02.15.22269115 medRxiv
Show abstract

Long-term recovery of limb function is a significant unmet need in people with paralysis. Targeted neuromodulation through epidural stimulation of the spinal cord, when paired with intense physical therapy, has shown promising results towards restoring volitional control of the upper limb in people with tetraplegia. Non-invasive neuromodulation of the cervical spinal cord using transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has shown similar improvements in upper-limb motor control rehabilitation. However, the potential rehabilitative effects of activating specific cervical spinal segments in a targeted fashion using tSCS has largely remained unexplored. We show in two individuals with SCI that tSCS of the cervical spinal cord resulted in up to 1136% increase in exerted force, with minimal physical therapy. We also show, for the first time, the effectiveness of targeted tSCS in restoring strength (407% increase) and dexterity to the digits in an individual with paralysis of the hand due to a peripheral nerve injury. Furthermore, we believe this is the first study to document a 3-point improvement in sensation in people with SCI or peripheral injury after receiving tSCS. Lastly, participant gains persisted after a one-month period void of stimulation, suggesting tSCS may lead to lasting benefits. Non-invasive targeted spinal cord stimulation shows tremendous promise as a safe and effective therapeutic approach with broad applications.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.