Back

Estimating the risk reduction of isolation on COVID-19 non-household transmission and severe/critical illness in non-immune individuals: September to November 2021

Prosser, A.; Helfer, B.; Streiner, D. L.

2022-02-07 public and global health
10.1101/2022.02.05.22270453 medRxiv
Show abstract

In the fall 2021, immunity mandates/passports for COVID-19 started to be discussed and implemented globally. In addition to increasing vaccination levels, these interventions isolate non-immune individuals from various settings to reduce non-household transmission and severe/critical illness. This is based on the hypothesis that the non-immune are at high absolute risk of these outcomes. However, these absolute risks were not quantified in the literature such that the absolute risk reductions of isolation on these outcomes remain unknown. This study estimated these absolute risks from September to November 2021 prior to the emergence of Omicron (B.1.1.529) using known data on the risk of infection, transmission in non-household settings, and age-stratified severe/critical illness in non-immune individuals for the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant, focusing on the European Union, United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia, and Israel. This allowed us to quantify the absolute risk reductions of isolation on (1) non-household transmission from the non-immune and (2) severe/critical illness amongst the non-immune in these regions during this period. We observed that on any given day the absolute risk reductions of isolation were typically small for transmission in most types of non-household settings and severe/critical illness in most age-groups, especially those aged <40. During a wave or sustained higher infection risks, the risk reductions were modest only for transmission in intimate social gatherings and severe/critical illness in adults aged [&ge;]50-60. The limitations of this study and the implications for the expected benefits of isolating non-immune individuals on reducing these outcomes are discussed.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
6
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
25
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%