Back

Microbial GWAS studies revealing combinations of Omicron RBD mutations existed and may contribute to antibody evasion and ACE2 binding

Ou, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhu, D.; Mao, S.; Wang, M.; Jia, R.; Chen, S.; Liu, M.; Yang, Q.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, S.; Huang, J.; Gao, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Peppelenbosch, M.; Pan, Q.; Cheng, A.-c.

2022-01-21 public and global health
10.1101/2022.01.19.22269510 medRxiv
Show abstract

Since Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 was first detected in South Africa (SA), it has now dominated in United Kingdom (UK) of Europe and United State (USA) of North America. A prominent feature of this variant is the gathering of spike protein mutations, in particularly at the receptor binding domain (RBD). These RBD mutations essentially contribute to antibody resistance of current immune approaches. During global spillover, combinations of RBD mutations may exist and synergistically contribute to antibody resistance in fact. Using three geographic-stratified genome wide association studies (GWAS), we observed that RBD combinations exhibited a geographic pattern and genetical associated, such as five common mutations in both UK and USA Omicron, six or two specific mutations in UK or USA Omicron. Although the UK specific RBD mutations can be further classified into two separated sub-groups of combination based on linkage disequilibrium analysis. Functional analysis indicated that the common RBD combinations (fold change, -11.59) alongside UK or USA specific mutations significantly reduced neutralization (fold change, -38.72, -18.11). As RBD overlaps with angiotensin converting enzyme 2(ACE2) binding motif, protein-protein contact analysis indicated that the common RBD mutations enhanced ACE2 binding accessibility and were further strengthened by UK or USA-specific RBD mutations. Spatiotemporal evolution analysis indicated that UK-specific RBD mutations largely contribute to global spillover. Collectively, we have provided genetic evidence of RBD combinations and estimated their effects on antibody evasion and ACE2 binding accessibility.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.1%
3
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
7
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
8
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
10
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
11
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
16
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
21
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
25
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%