Effectiveness of the EPA-based 'Toolbox Family Medicine' on students' learning satisfaction: study protocol for a controlled trial
Amarell, N.; Wehner, M.; Schroeder, J.; Wild, D.; Welchowski, T.; Weltermann, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundFamily practices constitute an important learning environment for medical students. However, teaching situations markedly vary between practices, and students frequently find rotations underwhelming. Especially, students active participation in patient care varies profoundly, although it has a significant impact on students interest in primary care careers. To standardize and improve learning situations in practices, we developed the so-called Toolbox Family Medicine (TFM) using the concept of entrustable professional activities. It provides standardized learning content appropriate for students levels and allows teaching adaptable to actual practice conditions. MethodsUsing a controlled trial with a waiting list control arm, we will evaluate the effectiveness of the toolbox on students learning satisfaction. A total of 94 students will be allocated 1:1 to intervention and control practices. The teaching concept Toolbox Family Medicine (TFM) comprises a didactic workshop for supervising physicians and a toolbox with practice-specific tasks for medical students. The primary outcome is students overall satisfaction with their learning progress after the rotation. Secondary outcomes include the kind and number of tasks performed, the entrusted level per task, the feasibility of implementing the toolbox in actual practice settings, and students motivation to pursue a career in primary care. DiscussionWe assume an improvement in learning satisfaction with the intervention. The study will begin with the next practice rotations. Administrative information O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f4c29aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1142ab3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ff5ba8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@da9808org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1337127_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL C_TBL
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 94%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 93%
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 93%
- Pre-Post Analysis of the Impact of British Columbia Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Clinics on Patient Health and Care Experience 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of Burnout Among Academic Family Medicine Faculty: Looking Back to Plan forward 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 94%
- COVI-Prim survey: Challenges for Austrian and German general practitioners during initial phase of COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 93%
- A Development and Implementation of a Preconception Counseling Program for Black Women and Men in the Southeastern United States: A Pilot Protocol 90%
- Impact of relaxing Covid-19 social distancing measures on rural North Wales: a simulation analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening practices among clinicians practicing in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A mixed methods study 92%
- Cancer risk perception and knowledge and physician communication behaviors: specific influences on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer screening in women 50-65 years old 91%
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.