Increasing discovery rates in preclinical research through optimised statistical decision criteria
Danziger, M.; Dirnagl, U.; Toelch, U.
Show abstract
The success of scientific discovery in preclinical research is based on the different roles of exploration and confirmation. Exploration involves identifying potential effects (high sensitivity), which are then tested more rigorously during confirmation (high specificity). Here, we examine different experimental strategies and their ability to balance sensitivity and specificity to identify relevant effects. In simulations based on empirical data, we specifically compare a conventional p-value based approach with a method based on an a priori determined smallest effect size of interest (SESOI). Using a SESOI increases transition rates from exploration to confirmation and leads to higher detection rates across the trajectory. In particular, specificity in the SESOI trajectory increases if number of true effects are low. We conclude that employing a SESOI is superior to a p-value based approach in many contexts. Based on our findings, we propose a reconsideration of planning and conducting preclinical experiments, especially when the prior probability of true hypotheses is low.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 92%
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 92%
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Almost significant: trends and P values in the use of phrases describing marginally significant results in 567,758 randomized controlled trials published between 1990 and 2020 92%
- Is N-Hacking Ever OK? A Simulation-based study 91%
- Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: how open is open? 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Refined Tamoxifen Administration in Mice by Encouraging Voluntary Consumption of Palatable Formulations. 89%
- AI for IACUC: Accurate Initial Assessment of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Protocols 89%
- Diet gel-based oral drug delivery system for controlled dosing of small molecules for microglia depletion and inducible Cre recombination in mice 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 92%
- How Informative Were Early SARS-CoV-2 Treatment and Prevention Trials? A longitudinal cohort analysis of trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov 92%
- Using numerical modelling and simulation to assess the ethical burden in clinical trials and how it relates to the proportion of responders in a trial sample 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ZIBGLMM: Zero-Inflated Bivariate Generalized Linear Mixed Model for Meta-Analysis with Double-Zero-Event Studies 93%
- Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: a simulation study 93%
- Revisiting and expanding the meta-analysis of variation: The log coefficient of variation ratio, lnCVR 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.