Immune responses to inactivated and vector-based vaccines in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2
Suntronwong, N.; Yorsaeng, R.; Auphimai, C.; Thongmee, T.; Vichaiwattana, P.; Kanokudom, S.; Assawakosri, S.; Nilyanimit, P.; Srimuan, D.; Thatsanatorn, T.; Sudhinaraset, N.; Wanlapakorn, N.; Poovorawan, Y.
Show abstract
Immunity wanes in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, and vaccinating those individuals may help reduce reinfection. Herein, reactogenicity and immunogenicity following vaccination with inactivated (CoronaVac) and vector-based (ChAdOx1-S, AZD1222) vaccines were examined in previously infected individuals. Immune response was also compared between short and long intervals between first date of detection and vaccination. Adverse events were mild but were higher with AZD1222 than with CoronaVac. Baseline IgG-specific antibodies and neutralizing activity were significantly higher with shorter than longer intervals. With a single-dose vaccine, IgG and IgA-specific binding antibodies, neutralizing activity, and total interferon-gamma response peaked at 14 days. Immune response was significantly higher in recovered individuals than in infection-naive individuals. Antibody response was greater with longer than shorter intervals. AZD1222 induced higher antibody and T cell responses than those of CoronaVac. Thus, to achieve immunity, individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 exposure may require only a single dose of AZD1222 or two doses of CoronaVac to achieve the immune response. These findings supported vaccine strategies in previously infected individuals.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 naïve and recovered individuals show qualitatively different antibody responses following mRNA vaccination 98%
- Kinetics and persistence of the cellular and humoral immune responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in SARS-CoV-2-naive and - experienced subjects 97%
- Longitudinal cellular and humoral immune responses following Covid-19 BNT162b2-mRNA-based booster vaccination of craft and manual workers in Qatar. 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a new SARS-CoV-2 recombinant Gamma variant RBD-based protein adjuvanted vaccine, used as heterologous booster in healthy adults: a Phase 1 interim report 97%
- Heterologous vaccination with inactivated and mRNA vaccines increases B and T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 97%
- Effect of booster vaccination against Delta and Omicron variants in Iceland 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Replicating bacterium-vectored vaccine expressing SARS-CoV-2 Membrane and Nucleocapsid proteins protects against severe COVID-19 disease in hamsters 96%
- Synthetic Multiantigen MVA Vaccine COH04S1 Protects Against SARS-CoV-2 in Syrian Hamsters and Non-Human Primates 96%
- Extended interval BNT162b2 vaccination enhances peak antibody generation in older people 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: A Randomised, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial 97%
- Comparison of the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a reduced and standard booster dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults after two doses of inactivated vaccine 96%
- Durability of antibody responses elicited by a single dose of Ad26.COV2.S and substantial increase following late boosting 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 prime-boost vaccination elicits potent neutralizing antibody responses and T cell reactivity 97%
- Dynamics of humoral and cellular immune responses after homologous and heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 97%
- The ChAdOx1 vectored vaccine, AZD2816, induces strong immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 Beta (B.1.351) and other variants of concern in preclinical studies. 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.