Back

Efficacy and Safety of Viable Selective Germline Genome Edited Pigs Skin Xenotransplants in Patients with Thermal Burns

zou, l.; zhang, y.; he, y.; Yu, H.; Yang, F.; Huang, J.; Qianglong, S.; Li, W.; zhang, y.; li, y.; zhou, g.; zou, x.; Chen, F.; wang, q.; Wei, H.; Zhao, H.; Hu, N.; Zeng, y.; yin, y.; Wang, G.

2022-01-05 transplantation
10.1101/2021.12.30.21267448 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRapid closure of open wound, either temporarily or perpetually, is recognized as the standard of care in patients with thermal burns. Human cadaveric allograft and simple genetically modified porcine xenografts are not able to provide enough durable time for extensively burned patients. A selective germline genome edited pig (SGGEP) skin xenograft, Xeno X skin, would be a valuable candidate to the clinical options. MethodsIn an ongoing investigator-initiated clinical trial in patients with thermal burns, the efficacy and safety of cryopreserved Xeno X skin grafts of SGGEP for burned patients were evaluated. Each patient received surgical grafting with a skin xenotransplant and wild type pig extracellular matrix (wpECM) in a side-by-side manner for in-situ comparison. The primary outcome measures of xeno-skin grafts included Xeno X skin safety and tolerability, as well as the quality and duration of temporary barrier function yielded by Xeno X skin grafts (as determined by Baux score). Seven parameters included in the analysis were vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and the overall opinion, with each calculated on an independent 0-10 scale. ResultsA total of 16 burned patients completed the trial. All the patients tolerated Xeno X skin grafts well and no advent events were observed. In all cases, Xeno X skin grafts were vascularized and fully adherent, they also exhibited better overall outcomes than those of wpECM. Xeno X skin grafts survived for at least 25 days without a need of any immunosuppressive drug, well consistent with our earlier preclinical studies in non-human primates. ConclusionXeno X skin grafts of SGGEP did not incur any signs of local and systemic safety issues, and in the meanwhile provided a high quality and long duration of temporary barrier function for burned patients. This is a major milestone in the xenotransplant field, indicating that genome-edited organ xenotransplant has become a clinical reality.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Regenerative Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.2%
3
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.4%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
8
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.2%
9
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
10
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
11
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
12
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
13
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Bioactive Materials
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
JID Innovations
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
American Journal of Transplantation
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.6%
30
Annals of Internal Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%