Back

Fractals disruption as the footprint of subthreshold depressive symptoms on the heart rate

mandarano, P.; Ossola, P.; Carsillo, M.; Marazzi, P.; Rozzi, S.; Lazzeroni, D.

2021-12-30 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2021.12.28.21268480 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPsychopathology, and in particular depression, is a cardiovascular risk factor independent from co-occurring pathology. This link is traced back to the mind-heart-body connection, whose underlying mechanisms are, to date, not completely known. To study psychopathology in relation to the heart, it is necessary to observe the autonomic nervous system, which mediates among the parts of that connection. Its gold standard of evaluation is the study of heart rate variability (HRV). ObjectiveTo assess whether any association exists between the HRV parameters and sub-threshold depressive symptoms in a sample of healthy subjects MethodsTwo short-term HRV recordings (5 min - supine and sitting) were analysed in 77 healthy subjects. Here we adopted a three-fold approach to evaluate HRV: a set of scores belonging to the time domain (SDNN, pNN50, RMSSD); to the frequency domain (high, low, and very low frequencies) and a set of nonlinear parameters. The PHQ-9 scale was used to detect depressive symptoms. ResultsDepressive symptoms were associated only with a parameter from the non-linear approach and specifically the long-term fluctuations of fractal dimensions (DFA-2). This association remained significant even after controlling for age, gender, BMI, arterial hypertension, anti-hypertensive drugs, dyslipidaemia, and smoking habit. Moreover, the DFA-2 was not affected by the baroreflex (postural change), unlike other autonomic markers. ConclusionIn conclusion, fractal analysis of HRV (DFA-2) allows to predict depressive symptoms below diagnostic threshold in healthy subjects regardless of their health status. DFA-2 may be then considered as an imprint of subclinical depression on the heart rhythm.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.