Back

Personalized Feeding Infusion Rate of Nutrition to Improve Glycemic Variability Control in Critical Care Patients

Abohtyra, R.

2021-12-24 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2021.12.23.21268339 medRxiv
Show abstract

Control-based algorithms in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients have been developed to deliver a sufficient amount of insulin, but optimizing the rate of feeding of nutrition in ICU patients to improve glycemic variability control has not been done yet. Continuous feeding is commonly used for nutrition in critically ill patients who cannot be fed orally to maintain a normal blood sugar concentration, but optimizing its rate, for these individuals, is needed to avoid the adverse outcomes caused by medications such as insulin. This paper develops a control-based algorithm combines a predictive control algorithm with a revised nonlinear compartmental model used in the ICU to design personalized feeding function rates to improve patient glycemic variability. Our control algorithm is robust and acts very quickly to avoid medical intervention effects.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 4%
33.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
● 23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.2%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Physiological Measurement
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Sensors
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
8
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
10
JMIRx Med
◐ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
○ 148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
16
Journal of Personalized Medicine
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
● 344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
Cancers
○ 213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Medical Decision Making
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Medicine
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Neurocomputing
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
IFAC-PapersOnLine
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Journal of Theoretical Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.