Back

Soil organic carbon fractionation and metagenomics pipeline to link carbon content and stability with microbial composition - First results investigating fungal endophytes

Buss, W.; Sharma, R.; Ferguson, S.; Borevitz, J. O.

2021-12-21 genomics
10.1101/2021.12.19.473394 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Society needs to capture gigatons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere annually and then store it long-term to limit and ultimately reverse the effects of climate change. Bringing lost carbon back into agricultural soils should be a priority as it brings the added benefit of improving soil properties. Linking soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions of different stability with soil microbial composition can help understand and subsequently manage SOC storage. Here we develop a pipeline for evaluating the effects of microbial management on SOC content using rapid and low-cost SOC fractionation and metagenomics approaches. We tested the methods in a wheat pot trial inoculated with 17 individual endophytic fungal isolates. Two fungi increased total SOC in the area under the plant stem by ~15%. The fractionation assay showed that the medium stability soil aggregate carbon fraction (AggC) was increased by one of these fungi (+21%) and the chemically recalcitrant proportion (bleach oxidation) of AggC by the other (+35%). Both fungi increased mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC), the long-term SOC storage, by ~10%. We used rapid, portable, low-cost, whole metagenome long read sequencing to detect a shift in the microbial composition for one of the fungi-inoculated treatments. This treatment showed a more diverse microbial community and a higher quantity of DNA in soil. The results emphasise the link between composition and abundance of soil microorganisms with soil carbon formation. Our dual carbon fractional and metagenomic analysis pipeline can be used to further test the effects of microbial management and ultimately to model the soil factors that influence SOC storage, such as nutrient and water availability, starting SOC content, soil texture and aggregation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.8%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
7
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
9
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
12
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
14
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
22
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%