Provider Confidence in Counseling Preconception, Pregnant, and Postpartum Patients Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination
Siegel, M. R.; James, K. E.; Jaffe, E.; L'Heureux, M. M.; Kaimal, A. J.; Goldfarb, I. T.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo assess knowledge and confidence in COVID-19 vaccine counseling among practitioners who provide care to pregnant persons and to describe factors associated with confidence in counseling. Study DesignA web-based anonymous survey was distributed via email to a cross-sectional convenience sample of OB/GYN, Primary Care, and Internal Medicine faculty at three hospitals in a single healthcare network in Massachusetts. Individual demographics and institution-specific variables were included in the survey along with questions assessing both attitudes toward COVID-19 illness in pregnancy as well as confidence in counseling regarding the use of the vaccine for pregnant patients. ResultsAlmost all providers (151, 98.1%) reported already receiving or being scheduled to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, and a majority of providers (111, 72.1%) reported that they believe the benefits of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy outweigh the risks. Forty-one (26.6%) reported feeling very confident in counseling patients who primarily speak English about the evidence for mRNA vaccination in pregnancy, and 36 (23%) reported feeling very confident in counseling patients who are not primarily English-speaking. Forty-three providers (28.1%) expressed strong confidence in their comfort talking to individuals with vaccine hesitancy based on historic and continued racism and systemic injustices. The sources that survey respondents most commonly used to find information regarding COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy were the CDC (112, 74.2%), hospital-specific resources (94, 62.3%) and ACOG (82, 54.3%). ConclusionWhile providers reported high personal uptake of COVID-19 vaccination and felt that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks in pregnancy, less than one-third felt very confident in counseling pregnant patients about available evidence for mRNA vaccine safety in pregnancy. Ensuring that providers feel comfortable bridging the gap between their belief that the vaccine is beneficial for pregnant patients and their comfort with holding conversations with patients regarding vaccination is paramount in order to ensure equitable access to vaccines for pregnant patients.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities of North Carolina 93%
- COVID-19 vaccine access and attitudes among people experiencing homelessness from pilot mobile phone survey in Los Angeles, CA 93%
- “All of the things to everyone everywhere”: A mixed methods analysis of community perspectives on equitable access to monoclonal antibody treatment for COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vaccine preparation time, errors, satisfaction, and preference of prefilled syringes versus RSV vaccines requiring reconstitution: randomized, time and motion study 92%
- Clinical and economic evaluation of a proteomic biomarker preterm birth risk predictor: Cost-effectiveness modeling of prenatal interventions applied to predicted higher-risk pregnancies within a large and diverse cohort 89%
- Reflex single-gene non-invasive prenatal testing significantly increases the cost-effectiveness of carrier screening 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of routine childhood immunizations in Ontario, Canada 94%
- Employer Requirements and COVID-19 Vaccination and Attitudes among Healthcare Personnel in the U.S.: Findings from National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module, August – September 2021 93%
- Midwives’ attitudes toward participation of pregnant women in a preventive vaccine hypothetical clinical trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine receipt at two integrated healthcare systems in New York City: A Cross sectional study of healthcare workers 93%
- Understanding national trends in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada – April 2020 to March 2021 92%
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s views on accepting COVID-19 vaccination during and after pregnancy, and for their babies: A multi-methods study in the UK 93%
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 91%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.