Predicted Symptomatic Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 Vaccine Against Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2
Volkov, O.
Show abstract
This paper presents predictions of the symptomatic effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) vaccine against Omicron B.1.1.529, the latest SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern. They were obtained assuming fold decreases in Omicron neutralisation by vaccine-induced antibodies versus neutralisation of the virus Wild Type. A 25-fold decrease was assumed based on Omicron pseudovirus neutralisation study by Pfizer and BioNTech; a 94-fold, based on live-Omicron neutralisation study in South Africa; and 40, 80 and 120 folds, hypothesised based on genetic information. The effectiveness of two vaccine doses was predicted as 66% (42, 86), 48% (25, 72) and 42% (20, 66) for up to five months starting 2-4 weeks after the second dose, for the 25, 80 and 120 folds, respectively. The effectiveness of booster vaccination was predicted under a highly conservative assumption that the third dose would increase neutralisation by only 3.3 folds compared to the second dose. The predictions of effectiveness for up to five months, starting 2-4 weeks after the third dose, were 81% (59, 95), 67% (43, 87) and 61% (37, 82) for the 25, 80 and 120 folds, respectively. Despite the large fold decreases considered, the vaccine could still provide substantial protection, particularly after a booster and against severe disease. The paper is accompanied by free software which can be used to predict the symptomatic effectiveness of Comirnaty against Omicron under different neutralisation folds, including those obtained experimentally.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting immune protection against outcomes of infectious disease from population-level effectiveness data with application to COVID-19 97%
- Interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission 95%
- Cost-effectiveness of routine COVID-19 adult vaccination programmes in England 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneity in vaccinal immunity to SARS-CoV-2 can be addressed by a personalized booster strategy 94%
- Epidemiological differences in the impact of COVID-19 vaccination in the United States and China 94%
- Modeling the impact of COVID-19 vaccination in Lebanon: A call to speed-up vaccine roll out 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Building resilient cervical cancer prevention through gender-neutral HPV vaccination 93%
- Reducing RSV hospitalisation in a lower-income country by vaccinating mothers-to-be and their households 93%
- Impact of COVID-19-related disruptions to measles, meningococcal A, and yellow fever vaccination in 10 countries 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.