Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using CT image Radiomics Features: A Comprehensive Machine Learning Study Involving 26,307 Patients
Shiri, I.; Salimi, Y.; Saberi, A.; Pakbin, M.; Hajianfar, G.; Haddadi Avval, A.; Sanaat, A.; Akhavanallaf, A.; Mostafaei, S.; Mansouri, Z.; Askari, D.; Ghasemian, M.; Sharifipour, E.; Sandoughdaran, S.; Sohrabi, A.; Sadati, E.; Livani, S.; Iranpour, P.; Kolahi, S.; Khosravi, B.; Khateri, M.; Bijari, S.; Atashzar, M. R.; Shayesteh, S. P.; Babaei, M. R.; Jenabi, E.; Hasanian, M.; Shahhamzeh, A.; Foroghi Gholami, S. Y.; Mozafari, A.; Shirzad-Aski, H.; Movaseghi, F.; Bozorgmehr, R.; Goharpey, N.; Abdollahi, H.; Geramifar, P.; Radmard, A. R.; Arabi, H.; Rezaei-Kalantari, K.; Oveisi, M.; Rahmim, A.;
Show abstract
PurposeTo derive and validate an effective radiomics-based model for differentiation of COVID-19 pneumonia from other lung diseases using a very large cohort of patients. MethodsWe collected 19 private and 5 public datasets, accumulating to 26,307 individual patient images (15,148 COVID-19; 9,657 with other lung diseases e.g. non-COVID-19 pneumonia, lung cancer, pulmonary embolism; 1502 normal cases). Images were automatically segmented using a validated deep learning (DL) model and the results carefully reviewed. Images were first cropped into lung-only region boxes, then resized to 296x216 voxels. Voxel dimensions was resized to 1x1x1mm3 followed by 64-bin discretization. The 108 extracted features included shape, first-order histogram and texture features. Univariate analysis was first performed using simple logistic regression. The thresholds were fixed in the training set and then evaluation performed on the test set. False discovery rate (FDR) correction was applied to the p-values. Z-Score normalization was applied to all features. For multivariate analysis, features with high correlation (R2>0.99) were eliminated first using Pearson correlation. We tested 96 different machine learning strategies through cross-combining 4 feature selectors or 8 dimensionality reduction techniques with 8 classifiers. We trained and evaluated our models using 3 different datasets: 1) the entire dataset (26,307 patients: 15,148 COVID-19; 11,159 non-COVID-19); 2) excluding normal patients in non-COVID-19, and including only RT-PCR positive COVID-19 cases in the COVID-19 class (20,697 patients including 12,419 COVID-19, and 8,278 non-COVID-19)); 3) including only non-COVID-19 pneumonia patients and a random sample of COVID-19 patients (5,582 patients: 3,000 COVID-19, and 2,582 non-COVID-19) to provide balanced classes. Subsequently, each of these 3 datasets were randomly split into 70% and 30% for training and testing, respectively. All various steps, including feature preprocessing, feature selection, and classification, were performed separately in each dataset. Classification algorithms were optimized during training using grid search algorithms. The best models were chosen by a one-standard-deviation rule in 10-fold cross-validation and then were evaluated on the test sets. ResultsIn dataset #1, Relief feature selection and RF classifier combination resulted in the highest performance (Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.99, sensitivity = 0.98, specificity = 0.94, accuracy = 0.96, positive predictive value (PPV) = 0.96, and negative predicted value (NPV) = 0.96). In dataset #2, Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) feature selection and Random Forest (RF) classifier combination resulted in the highest performance (AUC = 0.99, sensitivity = 0.98, specificity = 0.95, accuracy = 0.97, PPV = 0.96, and NPV = 0.98). In dataset #3, the ANOVA feature selection and RF classifier combination resulted in the highest performance (AUC = 0.98, sensitivity = 0.96, specificity = 0.93, accuracy = 0.94, PPV = 0.93, NPV = 0.96). ConclusionRadiomic features extracted from entire lung combined with machine learning algorithms can enable very effective, routine diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia from CT images without the use of any other diagnostic test.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High-Dimensional Multinomial Multiclass Severity Scoring of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using CT Radiomics Features and Machine Learning Algorithms 99%
- An ML prediction model based on clinical parameters and automated CT scan features for COVID-19 patients 97%
- Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 95%
- Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity: utilizing radiomics model in clinical translation 95%
- A deep learning algorithm using CT images to screen for Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 95%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 94%
- Volumetric lung cancer screening reduces unnecessary low-dose computed tomography scans: results from a single-centre prospective trial on 4,119 subjects 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 96%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 95%
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 95%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 95%
- Persistent Homology of Tumor CT Scans is Associated with Survival In Lung Cancer 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.