The Direct Subjective Refraction: Unsupervised measurements of subjective refraction using defocus waves
Rodriguez-Lopez, V.; Hernandez-Poyatos, A.; Dorronsoro, C.
Show abstract
We present the Direct Subjective Refraction (DSR), a new subjective refraction method, and validate it vs the Traditional Subjective Refraction (TSR) and an unsupervised version of it (UTSR). We project an optotunable lens onto the eye to create Temporal Defocus Waves produces flicker and chromatic distortions, minimum when the mean optical power of the wave matches the spherical equivalent of the eye. 25 subjects performed the DSR visual and UTSR tasks without supervision. DSR is more repeatable than TSR and UTSR (standard deviations {+/-}0.17D, {+/-}0.28, and {+/-}0.47D). The time per repetition of DSR is only 39s (almost 6 min for TSR). Cyclopegia severely affects UTSR, but not DSR, confirming that the DSR task de-activates the accommodative system. DSR is a new method to obtain the spherical equivalent that does not requires supervision and overpasses existing subjective methods in terms of accuracy, precision, and measurement time.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic Measurements of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements by Video-Oculography and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection 97%
- Quotidian Profile of Vergence Angle in Ambulatory Subjects Monitored with Wearable Eye Tracking Glasses 96%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Salzburg Visual Field Trainer (SVFT): A virtual reality device for (the evaluation of) neuropsychological rehabilitation 96%
- Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques 95%
- The evaluation of a web‐based tool for measuring the uncorrected visual acuity and refractive error in keratoconus eyes: a prospective open‐label method comparison study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coarse-scale Optoretinography(CoORG) with extended field-of-view for normative characterization. 96%
- Eye tracking-based estimation and compensation of chromatic offsets for multi-wavelength retinal microstimulation with foveal cone precision 94%
- Improvements to strip-based digital image registration for robust eye-tracking and to minimize distortions in images from scanned ophthalmic imaging systems 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.