Plug and play: Is "directed endosymbiosis" of chloroplasts possible?

The origin of mammalian mitochondria and plant chloroplasts is thought to be endosymbiosis. Millennia ago, a bacterium related to typhus-causing bacteria may have been consumed by a proto-eukaryote and over time evolved into an organelle inside eukaryotic cells, known as a mitochondrion. The plant chloroplast is believed to have evolved in a similar fashion from cyanobacteria. This project attempted to use "directed endosymbiosis" (my term) to investigate if chloroplasts can be taken up by a land animal and continue to function. It has been shown previously that mouse fibroblasts could incorporate isolated chloroplasts when co-cultured. Photosynthetic bacteria containing chloroplasts have been successfully injected into zebrafish embryos, mammalian cells, and ischemic rodent hearts. The photosynthetic alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (C. reinhardtii) has also been injected into zebrafish embryos. However, to the best of my knowledge, injection of isolated chloroplasts into a land animal embryo has not been attempted before. In four pilot experiments, solutions of chloroplasts in PBS were microinjected into Drosophila melanogaster (D. melanogaster) embryos to determine if the embryos would tolerate the foreign protein. Interestingly, results indicated that a portion of the D. melanogaster embryos appeared to tolerate the injections and survive to adulthood. To determine if chloroplasts had indeed been transferred, larvae were placed under fluorescent microscopy. Chlorophyll (serving as the reporter) was found to be present in several larvae and to decline in amount over time. To investigate if the chloroplasts still functioned, a radiotracer food intake assay was performed. It was hypothesized that if the chloroplasts were generating ATP (and possibly glucose), the larvae might need less food. Results indicated a decrease in intake, however this might have occurred for other reasons.