Back

Comparison of subjective peripheral sensation, F-waves, and somatosensory evoked potentials in response to a unilateral pinch task measured on the contractile and non-contractile sides

Takahara, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Seki, K.; Onodera, S.

2021-12-02 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.12.02.470947 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Depression of sensory input during voluntary muscle contractions has been demonstrated using electrophysiological methods in both animals and humans. However, the association between electrophysiological responses of the sensory system and subjective peripheral sensation (SPS) during a voluntary muscle contraction remains unclear. Our aim in this study was to describe the changes in SPS, spinal -motoneuron excitability (F-wave to M-wave amplitude), and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during a unilateral pinch-grip task. Outcome variables were measured on the side ipsilateral and contralateral to the muscle contraction, and at rest (control). Participants were 8 healthy men, 20.9{+/-}0.8 years of age. The isometric pinch-grip task was performed at 30% of the maximum voluntary isometric force measured for the right and left hand separately. The appearance rate of the F-wave during the task was significantly higher for the ipsilateral (right) hand than for the contralateral (left) hand and control condition. Although there was no difference in F-wave latency between hands and the control condition, the amplitude of the F-wave was significantly higher for the ipsilateral (right) hand than for the contralateral (left) hand and the control condition. There was no difference in the amplitude of the SEP at N20. However, the amplitude at P25 was significantly lower for the ipsilateral (right) hand than for the contralateral (left) hand and the control condition. The accuracy rate of detecting tactile stimulation, evaluated for 20 repetitions using a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament at the sensory threshold for each participant, was significantly lower during the pinch-grip task for both the ipsilateral (right) and contralateral (left) hand compared to the control condition. Overall, our findings show that SPS and neurophysiological parameters were not modulated in parallel during the task, with changes in subjective sensation preceding changes in electrophysiological indices during the motor task. Our findings provide basic information on sensory-motor coordination.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.7%
3
Neuroscience Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
6
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
7
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
10
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
14
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
19
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Pain Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.8%
25
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
European Journal of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%