Back

The Reputational Dividends of Collaborating with a Highly Reputable Agency: The Case of the FDA and Its Domestic Partner Agencies

Maor, M.; Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R.; Balmas, M.

2021-12-07 health policy
10.1101/2021.12.01.21267117 medRxiv
Show abstract

What, if any, dividends do agencies reap from collaboration with a highly reputable agency, such as the FDA? Utilizing a dataset covering 30 U.S. federal agencies over a period of 34 years (1980-2013), we estimate the short and long-term reputational effects of interagency collaboration. Collaboration is measured by the number of memorandums of understanding (MOUs) in effect between each agency and the FDA, while agency reputation is assessed using an automated measure of media-coverage valence (positive/negative tone) for each agency-year. To account for potential reverse and reciprocal causality, we utilize cross-lagged fixed-effects models. We find evidence of moderate rises in reputation due to increased collaboration with the FDA. These effects persist significantly for two years, before decaying to null after four years. Employing similar analyses, we furthermore estimate reversed causality - of reputation on the level of consequent collaboration - finding no evidence of such effects. Research SupportMoshe Maor and Raanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Israel Science Foundation under grant 1002/11.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
5
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
8
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
10
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
11
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
15
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
24
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%