SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant saliva viral load is 15-fold higher than wild-type strains
Imai, K.; Ikeno, R.; Tanaka, H.; Takada, N.
Show abstract
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variants has escalated COVID-19 cases globally due to their high transmissibility. Since saliva is crucial for SARS-CoV-2 transmission, we hypothesized that a higher viral load of Delta variants in saliva than their parental wild-type strains contributed to the high transmissibility in the first place. However, studies have not reported this particular comparison done with viral copy numbers. Twenty-two genetically confirmed -positive saliva samples for wild-type strain and 32 Delta variants were statistically compared for viral copy number per milliliter determined by real-time qPCR combined with synthesized viral RNA and Poissons null distribution equation between the groups of wild and variant strains and between whole saliva and centrifugal supernatant in each group. We found that the copy number of the Delta variants was 15.1 times higher than wild-type strains of the whole saliva. In addition, the viral load of both strains in the whole saliva was higher than the pertinent supernatant, indicating that most viruses in the whole saliva are associated with host cells. Meanwhile, more than a million virions per milliliter of the viral load of the variants in the supernatants were 4.0 times higher but not significant than wild-type strains. Humanity must share our findings; the simple but concrete note that Delta variant viral load is abundant in the saliva is critical for preventing the spread of infection.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Viral loads and profile of the patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta, Alpha or R.1 variants in Tokyo 94%
- Real-life performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis: a prospective study 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 R.1 lineage variants prevailed in Tokyo in March 2021 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The evaluation of a newly developed antigen test (QuickNavi™-COVID19 Ag) for SARS-CoV-2: A prospective observational study in Japan 93%
- Clinical Evaluation of the Novel Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Point-of-Care Test (Smart Gene SARS-CoV-2) in the analysis of Nasopharyngeal and Anterior Nasal samples 93%
- The evaluation of a novel digital immunochromatographic assay with silver amplification to detect SARS-CoV-2 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of GENECUBE ® HQ SARS-CoV-2 for anterior nasal samples and saliva samples with a new rapid examination protocol 94%
- Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 virus in saliva using a guanidium based transport medium suitable for RT-PCR diagnostic assays 93%
- Difference in TMPRSS2 usage by Delta and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2: Implication for a sudden increase among children 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.