Back

Cell-Projection Pumping of Fibroblast Contents into Osteosarcoma SAOS-2 Cells Correlates with Increased SAOS-2 Proliferation and Migration, and also with Altered Morphology

Mahadevan, S.; Cornwell, J. A.; Chami, B.; Kelly, E.; Zoellner, H.

2021-11-23 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.11.23.469761 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We earlier reported that cell-projection pumping transfers fibroblast contents to cancer cells, and this alters cancer cell phenotype. We now report on single-cell tracking of time lapse recordings from co-cultured fluorescent fibroblasts and SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells, tracking 5,201 cells across 7 experiments. The fluorescent lipophilic marker DiD was used to label fibroblast organelles, and to trace transfer of fibroblast cytoplasm into SAOS-2. We related SAOS-2 phenotypic change to levels of fluorescence transfer from fibroblasts to SAOS-2, and also to what we term compensated fluorescence, that numerically projects mother cell fluorescence post-mitosis, into daughter cells. Comparison of absolute with compensated fluorescence, allowed deduction if phenotypic effects in mother SAOS-2, were inherited by their daughters. SAOS-2 receipt of fibroblast fluorescence correlated by Kendalls tau: with cell-profile area, and without evidence for persistence in daughter cells (median tau = 0.51, p < 0. 016); negatively and weakly with cell circularity, and with evidence for persistence (median tau = -0.19, p < 0.05); and very weakly with cell migration velocity, and without evidence for persistence (median tau = 0.01, p < 0.016). Also, mitotic SAOS-2 had higher rates of prior fluorescence uptake (median = 64.9 units/day), compared with non dividing cells (median = 35.6 units/day, p < 0.016), and there was no evidence for persistence post-mitosis. We conclude there is appreciable impact of cell-projection pumping on cancer cell phenotype, relevant to cancer histopathological diagnosis, clinical spread, and growth, with most effects reset by cancer cell mitosis.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.