COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual cycle changes: A United Kingdom (UK) retrospective case-control study
Alvergne, A.; Kountourides, G.; Argentieri, A.; Agyen, L.; Rogers, N.; Knight, D.; Sharp, G. C.; Maybin, J. A.; Olszewska, Z.
10.1101/2021.11.23.21266709 medRxivShow abstract
BackgroundThere has been increasing public concern that COVID-19 vaccines cause menstrual cycle disturbances, yet there is currently limited data to evaluate the impact of vaccination on menstrual health. Our objectives were (1) to evaluate the prevalence of menstrual changes following vaccination against COVID-19, (2) to test potential risk factors for any such changes, and (3) to identify patterns of symptoms in participants written accounts. MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective online survey titled "The Covid-19 Pandemic and Womens Reproductive Health", conducted in March 2021 in the UK before widespread media attention regarding potential impacts of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on menstruation. Participants were recruited via a Facebook ad campaign in the UK and eligibility criteria for survey completion were age greater than 18 years, having ever menstruated and currently living in the UK. In total, 26,710 people gave consent and completed the survey. For this analysis we selected 4,989 participants who were pre-menopausal and vaccinated. These participants were aged 28 to 43, predominantly from England (81%), of white background (95%) and not using hormonal contraception (58%). FindingsAmong pre-menopausal vaccinated individuals (n=4,989), 80% did not report any menstrual cycle changes up to 4 months after their first COVID-19 vaccine injection. Current use of combined oral contraceptives was associated with lower odds of reporting any changes by 48% (OR = 0.52, 95CI = [0.34 to 0.78], P<0.001). Odds of reporting any menstrual changes were increased by 44% for current smokers (OR = 1.44, 95CI = [1.07 to 1.94], P<0.01) and by more than 50% for individuals with a positive COVID status [Long Covid (OR = 1.61, 95CI = [1.28 to 2.02], P<0.001), acute COVID (OR = 1.54, 95CI = [1.27 to 1.86], P<0.001)]. The effects remain after adjusting for self-reported magnitude of menstrual cycle changes over the year preceding the survey. Written accounts report diverse symptoms; the most common words include "cramps", "late", "early", "spotting", "heavy" and "irregular", with a low level of clustering among them. ConclusionsFollowing vaccination for COVID-19, menstrual disturbance occurred in 20% of individuals in a UK sample. Out of 33 variables investigated, smoking and a previous history of SARS-CoV-2 infection were found to be risk factors while using oestradiol-containing contraceptives was found to be a protective factor. Diverse experiences were reported, from menstrual bleeding cessation to heavy menstrual bleeding.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 97%
- Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK 94%
- Assessing the relationship between menstrual products and reproductive and urogenital tract infections (RUTIs): a systematic review evaluating the evidence and recommendations for future research 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationships between women’s reproductive factors: a Mendelian randomization analysis 93%
- Deep Immunophenotyping Reveals Endometriosis is Marked by Dysregulation of the Mononuclear Phagocytic System in Endometrium and Peripheral Blood 92%
- Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 92%
- The Menstrual Practice Needs Scale Short Form (MPNS-SF) and Rapid (MPNS-R): Development in Khulna, Bangladesh, and validation in cross-sectional surveys from Bangladesh and Uganda 91%
- Landscape Analysis of Pregnancy Exposure Registries in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Scoping Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial heterogeneity of menstrual discriminatory practices against Nepalese women: a population-based study using the 2022 Demographic and Health Survey 92%
- Use of machine learning methods to understand discussions of female genital mutilation/cutting on social media 92%
- Adolescent boys’ sociocultural beliefs and attitudes toward menstruation in selected high schools in Ghana: Mediation and moderation effect of knowledge 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.