Back

Association between Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Coronary Heart Disease: a retrospective case-control analysis and Mendelian Randomization Study

Chen, J.; Tian, J.; Wang, W.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, W.; Cai, M.; Zhang, P.; Xu, T.; Wu, M.

2021-11-24 rheumatology
10.1101/2021.11.23.21266652 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo appraise the causal effect of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) for risk of Coronary heart disease (CHD). MethodsWe selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with SLE as instrumental variables (IVs) from three independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the three largest to date for SLE of European ancestry. Then we conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (2SMR) analyses to estimate the effects of IVs on the odds of CHD and traditional coronary risk factors (including high LDL cholesterol levels, low HDL cholesterol levels, Apolipoprotein A-I, Apolipoprotein B, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension). Additionally, we searched for common risk loci between SLE and premature coronary atherosclerosis. Furthermore, we retrospectively reviewed the lipid profile of treatment-naive SLE patients and age-matched healthy controls. ResultsGenetically predicted SLE did not increase the odds of CHD. Nevertheless, we found mild causal relationships between SLE and decreased HDL cholesterol levels, and between SLE and decreased apolipoprotein A-I. There was one common risk locus (rs597808) between SLE and premature coronary atherosclerosis at a genome-wide significance level (P<5 x 10-8). Retrospective analysis showed decreased HDL-cholesterol (0.98{+/-}0.516mmol/L vs. 1.46{+/-}0.307mmol/L in female, 0.76{+/-}0.199mmol/L vs. 1.19{+/-}0.257mmol/L in male; both P<0.001) and apolipoprotein A-I (1.06{+/-}0.314g/L vs. 1.37{+/-}0.205g/L in female, 0.87{+/-}0.174g/L vs. 1.24{+/-}0.200g/L in male; both P<0.001) in naive SLE patients. ConclusionSLE may accelerate coronary atherosclerosis in young patients by reducing HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I intrinsically, but it seems not to play a predominant role in CHD development in old patients.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.