Reducing false-positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnoses using long-range RT-qPCR
te Velthuis, A. J. W.; Juozapaite, D.; Rigby, C.; Olendraite, I.; Mathur, P.; Dhanorkar, K.; Hulle, V.; Shah, T.; Jadhao, V.; Mutha, S.; Jalal, H.; Gopal, V.
Show abstract
During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, residual SARS-CoV-2 genome and subgenomic RNA fragments were observed in recovered COVID-19 patients. The presence of such RNAs in the absence of live virus leads to incorrectly positive RT-qPCR results, potentially delaying medical procedures and quarantine release. We here propose a simple modification to turn commercial COVID-19 RT-qPCR protocols into long-range RT-qPCR assays that can differentiate between infectious and non-infectious influenza and coronavirus RNA levels. We find that the long-range RT-qPCR method has a sensitivity that is indistinguishable from a commercial Taq-Path COVID-19 RT-qPCR assay when tested on clinical samples taken withing 5 days of the onset of symptoms. In clinical samples taken at least 15 days after the onset of symptoms when patients had recovered from COVID-19, the modified RT-qPCR protocol leads to significantly fewer positive diagnoses. These findings suggest that the long-range RT-qPCR method may improve test-to-release protocols and expand the tools available for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis. ImportanceVarious molecular tests can detect viral RNA in clinical samples. However, these molecular tests cannot differentiate between RNA from infectious viruses or residual viral genome fragments that are not infectious. In several percent of COVID-19 patients, such residual viral RNAs can be detected long after recovery and the disappearance of infectious SARS-CoV-2. These "persistently-positive" RT-qPCR results are different from false-positive RT-qPCR results, which can be generated due to in vitro cross-reactivity or contaminations. However, the detection of RNA fragments leads to incorrect conclusions about the status of a COVID-19 patient and an incorrect diagnosis. We here modified the commercial Taq-Path COVID-19 RT-qPCR kit to make this test less sensitive to residual viral RNA genome fragments, reducing the likelihood that incorrect RT-qPCR results affect the treatment or quarantine status of recovered COVID-19 patients.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extraction-free protocol combining Proteinase K and heat inactivation for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR 94%
- SARS-CoV-2 detection and genomic sequencing from hospital surface samples collected at UC Davis 94%
- Validation of saline, PBS and a locally produced VTM at varying storage conditions to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus by qRT-PCR 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- UV-C irradiation is highly effective in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 replication 94%
- The virucidal effects of 405 nm visible light on SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus 94%
- Detection and Quantification of Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus-2 in Diverse Clinical and Environmental Samples from Infected Patients: Evidence to Support Respiratory Droplet, and Direct and Indirect Contact as Significant Modes of Transmission 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- IMMUNO-COV™ v2.0: Development and Validation of a High-Throughput Clinical Assay for Measuring SARS-CoV-2-Neutralizing Antibody Titers 92%
- Amplicon and metagenomic analysis of MERS-CoV and the microbiome in patients with severe Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) 92%
- Can Plitidepsin Be Used as an Antiviral Against RSV? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ancestral lineage of SARS-CoV-2 is more stable in human biological fluids than Alpha, Beta and Omicron variants of concern 94%
- Multiplex Target-Redundant RT-LAMP for Robust Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Fluorescent Universal Displacement Probes 93%
- Targeted Hybridization Capture of SARS-CoV-2 and Metagenomics Enables Genetic Variant Discovery and Nasal Microbiome Insights 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.