Back

A Mathematical Model for Stability Analysis of Covid like Epidemic/Endemic/Pandemic

Kumar, S.; Awasthi, A. K.

2021-11-11 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.11.08.21265055 medRxiv
Show abstract

The transmission and spread of infectious disease like Covid-19 occurs through horizontal and vertical mode. The causative pathogens for such kind of disease may be bacterium, protozoa, virus or toxin. The infectious diseases like AIDS, SARS, MARS, Polio Plague, Bubonic Plague and Covid-19 have destroyed the social and economic structure of world population. The world scientific community adopts different mechanisms to model and analyse the population dynamics of infectious disease outbreaks. Mathematical Modelling is the most effective tool to take the informed decision about the containment, control and eradication of the pandemic. The main focus of Government and public health authorities is to design the strategy in destabilising the spread and impact of the infections. A series of models-SIR, SEIR, SEIRD, SEAIHCRD, SAUQAR has been under study to combat the Covid-19 since its inception. An effort has been made to design the model based on reproduction number, endemic equilibrium and disease-free equilibrium to curtail the impact of Covid-19 through stability analysis methods-Hurwitz stability criteria, Lyapunov Method and Linear Stability Analysis.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Infectious Disease Modelling
○ 54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nonlinear Dynamics
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Journal of Theoretical Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
7
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
● 23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
11
JMIRx Med
◐ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
12
The European Physical Journal Plus
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Epidemiology and Infection
◐ 89 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
17
Physical Biology
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Journal of Mathematical Biology
○ 40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
○ 69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Applied Sciences
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
● 17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
BioMed Research International
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Cureus
○ 68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Public Health
○ 148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
COVID
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.