The effects of maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, pregnancy smoking and alcohol consumption on molar-incisor hypomineralisation: A negative control study
Lim, Q.-Y.; Taylor, K.; Dudding, T.
Show abstract
ObjectivesO_LIExplore associations between modifiable maternal pregnancy exposures: pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), pregnancy smoking and alcohol consumption with offspring molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH). C_LIO_LIUse negative control analyses to explore for the presence of confounding. C_LI MethodsUsing prospectively collected data from Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), we performed logistic regression to explore confounder adjusted associations between maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and smoking and alcohol consumption during pregnancy with MIH. We compared these with negative control exposure (paternal BMI, smoking and alcohol) and outcome (offspring dental trauma) analyses. Results5,536 mother/offspring pairs were included (297 MIH cases [5.4%]). We found a weak, positive association between maternal mean BMI and offspring MIH (OR per 1{square}kg/m2 difference in BMI: 1.04, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.08). Results of subsequent analyses suggested this effect was non-linear and being driven by women in the highest BMI quintile (OR for women in the highest BMI quintile versus the lowest: 1.61 95%CI: 1.02, 2.60). Negative control analyses showed no evidence of an association between paternal BMI and offspring MIH (OR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.89,1.00) and maternal BMI and offspring dental trauma (OR: 0.99, 95%CI: 0.96, 1.02). There was no clear evidence of an association for maternal smoking (OR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.46,1.22) or alcohol consumption (OR: 0.79, 95%CI: 0.56, 1.21) with offspring MIH with results imprecisely estimated. ConclusionWe found evidence of a possible intrauterine effect for high maternal pre-pregnancy BMI on offspring MIH, but no robust evidence of an intrauterine effect for maternal pregnancy smoking or alcohol consumption. A key limitation includes possible misclassification of MIH. Replication of these results is warranted.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What if risk factors influenced the variability of health outcomes as well as the mean? Evidence and implications 91%
- Serum metabolome indicators of early childhood development in the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019) 90%
- Environment-wide and epigenome-wide association study of adiposity in "Children of 1997" birth cohort 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal childhood trauma and perinatal distress predict the development of attention in infants from 6 to 18 months in a Swedish cohort study 91%
- Genetic score associations with birthweight in preterm-born infants compared with term-born infants 90%
- Prevalence and risk factors of self-reported audiovestibular symptoms in a population-based sample from rural northeastern Germany 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Nurture: Estimating the direct genetic effects of pediatric anthropometric traits 89%
- Genetic Heterogeneity and Homogeneity Among Orofacial Cleft Subtypes: Genome-Wide Association Studies in the Cleft Collective 88%
- Copy Number Variants and their Implications for Developmental and Behavioural Problems in Cleft Lip and/or Palate 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.