Intravenous corticosteroid treatment in adult patients with sepsis defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wu, Y.-P.; Lin, C.-K.; Hamaya, R.; Huang, F.-Y.; Chien, Y.-S.; Hsu, Y.-T.; Chen, S.-T.; Papatheodorou, S.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo summarize the effects of intravenous corticosteroid treatment for sepsis defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria in adult patients. DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis. MethodsWe searched RCTs from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to July 12th, 2019 and updated on June 28th, 2020. Conference proceedings from relevant societies and the reference lists of previous reviews were manually screened. Abstract or full-text articles were screened by two independent investigators. We included RCTs where (1) the participants had infections and the baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [≥] 2 (the Sepsis-3 definitions) (2) the intervention involved any intravenous corticosteroids; (3) the control group received placebo or standard of care (4) the outcomes of interest included mortality or clinical recovery. We chose the 28-day mortality as the pre-specified primary outcome and risk ratio (RR) as the effect measure. We followed PRISMA guidelines and chose random-effects models for the pooled analyses. ResultsThis study included 24 RCTs and 19 of them (7,115 participants) reported the 28-day mortality. Pooled analyses showed that intravenous corticosteroid treatment compared to placebo or standard of care was not associated with a lower risk of 28-day mortality (RR, 0.88; 95%CI, 0.73 to 1.05), but with a higher risk of hyperglycemia (RR, 1.16; 95%CI, 1.06 to 1.27). Sensitivity analysis of high-quality studies revealed a similar result for the 28-day mortality (RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.86 to 1.05). ConclusionsOur findings suggested that intravenous corticosteroids compared to placebo or standard of care may not reduce the 28-day mortality in adult patients with sepsis defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria. Further studies are warranted to clarify the roles of disease severity and treatment timing in the effects of corticosteroid treatment in this population. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019143083 Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThis is the first systematic review and meta-analysis that summarized the effects of intravenous corticosteroid treatments in patients with sepsis defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria. C_LIO_LIWe provide the quality of evidence to support the development of treatment guidelines specific to the Sepsis-3 cohort. C_LIO_LIWe only include randomized controlled trials in this systematic review and meta-analysis, which exclude less controlled evidences from clinical settings closer to our daily practice. C_LIO_LIThe Sepsis-3 definitions will be retrospectively applied to the included studies, so clinical trials without enough reported baseline data available may be excluded. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 as cause of viral sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 96%
- Prone positioning of non-intubated patients with COVID-19 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 93%
- Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in patients with COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab in a randomised controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Criteria to Achieve Safe Antimicrobial Intravenous-to-Oral Switch in Hospitalised Adult Populations: A Systematic Rapid Review 93%
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 92%
- Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 – a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome? 93%
- Meropenem vs standard of care for treatment of neonatal late onset sepsis (NeoMero1): a randomised controlled trial 93%
- The protective association between statins use and adverse outcomes among COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Transcriptomic Severity Metric that Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Sepsis Patients 91%
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome and shunt detection with bubble studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Non-Pharmacologic Strategies on Prevention or Management of Intensive Care Unit Delirium: A Systematic Review 91%
- Bacterial and Fungal Co-Infections among ICU COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients in a Palestinian Hospital: Incidence and Antimicrobial Stewardship 87%
- Findings of a feasibility study of pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation to reduce post-operative pulmonary complications in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease scheduled for major abdominal surgery. 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.