Back

Intravenous corticosteroid treatment in adult patients with sepsis defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wu, Y.-P.; Lin, C.-K.; Hamaya, R.; Huang, F.-Y.; Chien, Y.-S.; Hsu, Y.-T.; Chen, S.-T.; Papatheodorou, S.

2021-10-18 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2021.10.17.21265100 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo summarize the effects of intravenous corticosteroid treatment for sepsis defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria in adult patients. DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis. MethodsWe searched RCTs from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to July 12th, 2019 and updated on June 28th, 2020. Conference proceedings from relevant societies and the reference lists of previous reviews were manually screened. Abstract or full-text articles were screened by two independent investigators. We included RCTs where (1) the participants had infections and the baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [≥] 2 (the Sepsis-3 definitions) (2) the intervention involved any intravenous corticosteroids; (3) the control group received placebo or standard of care (4) the outcomes of interest included mortality or clinical recovery. We chose the 28-day mortality as the pre-specified primary outcome and risk ratio (RR) as the effect measure. We followed PRISMA guidelines and chose random-effects models for the pooled analyses. ResultsThis study included 24 RCTs and 19 of them (7,115 participants) reported the 28-day mortality. Pooled analyses showed that intravenous corticosteroid treatment compared to placebo or standard of care was not associated with a lower risk of 28-day mortality (RR, 0.88; 95%CI, 0.73 to 1.05), but with a higher risk of hyperglycemia (RR, 1.16; 95%CI, 1.06 to 1.27). Sensitivity analysis of high-quality studies revealed a similar result for the 28-day mortality (RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.86 to 1.05). ConclusionsOur findings suggested that intravenous corticosteroids compared to placebo or standard of care may not reduce the 28-day mortality in adult patients with sepsis defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria. Further studies are warranted to clarify the roles of disease severity and treatment timing in the effects of corticosteroid treatment in this population. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019143083 Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThis is the first systematic review and meta-analysis that summarized the effects of intravenous corticosteroid treatments in patients with sepsis defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria. C_LIO_LIWe provide the quality of evidence to support the development of treatment guidelines specific to the Sepsis-3 cohort. C_LIO_LIWe only include randomized controlled trials in this systematic review and meta-analysis, which exclude less controlled evidences from clinical settings closer to our daily practice. C_LIO_LIThe Sepsis-3 definitions will be retrospectively applied to the included studies, so clinical trials without enough reported baseline data available may be excluded. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
4
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
5
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
6
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Pediatric Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
9
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
15
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
16
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
21
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
CHEST
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
30
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%