Back

Trans Sodium Crocetinate (TSC) to Improve Oxygenation in COVID-19

Streinu-Cercel, A.; Sandulescu, O.; Miron, V. D.; Oana, A.-A.; Motoi, M. M.; Galloway, C. D.; Streinu-Cercel, A.

2021-10-12 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2021.10.08.21264719 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTrans Sodium Crocetinate (TSC) is a bipolar synthetic carotenoid under development as a drug to enhance oxygenation to hypoxic tissue in addition to standard of care. TSC acts via a novel mechanism of action, improving the diffusivity of oxygen in blood plasma. Thus, it is based on physical-chemical principles, unlike most drugs which are based on biochemistry-based mechanisms. We explored the use of escalating doses and multiple daily dosing of TSC as a potential therapeutic for patients suffering from hypoxemia due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. MethodsIndividuals [&ge;]18 years who were hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and hypoxemia, defined as SpO2 < 94% on room air or requiring supplemental oxygen, WHO ordinal scale 3 through 7 (exclusive of Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation [ECMO]) were enrolled in cohorts of six subjects, each of whom received the same dose (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg/kg) of TSC via intravenous bolus every 6 hours in addition to standard of care (SOC). This report describes the safety and efficacy results from the lead-in phase of the study and the population pharmacokinetics (PK) analyses. Safety was assessed as the number of serious adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed with each dose. Several efficacy parameters were examined in the lead-in phase and descriptive statistics of efficacy parameters are provided. No formal statistical analyses were performed. The population PK analyses were based on previous analyses and examination of the concentration profiles, and two-compartment linear pharmacokinetic models were evaluated and validated. Covariates, including body size, age, sex, organ function, and dose level, were evaluated for inclusion into the model. ResultsTSC was well tolerated. There were no treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported. There were 2 serious adverse events (SAEs) reported during the study, neither were considered treatment-related. A total of 24 (96%) subjects survived. One subject (4.0%) died during the study as a result of an SAE (respiratory failure), and that event was determined to be due to COVID-19 complications and not related to study drug. There was an observed reduction in the time to improvement in WHO Ordinal Scale with increasing dose. The median time to 1-point reduction in subjects receiving 0.25 mg/kg was 11.5 days versus 7.5 days in the 1.5 mg/kg treatment cohort. The overall range across all doses was 1 day to 28 days. A total of 36.0% of subjects had a 1-point improvement in WHO Ordinal Scale to Day 7. The 1.5 mg/kg dose resulted in observed superior outcomes for multiple secondary clinical outcomes: time to 1-point WHO Ordinal Score improvement through Day 29/discharge, 1-point improvement by Day 7, days to return to room air, and hospital length of stay. The PK results showed that the two-compartment model fit the data well. Clearance decreased with increasing dose level and there was no evidence that clearance was affected by covariates other than dose level. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that TSC administration every 6 hours at doses up to 1.5 mg/kg for up to 15 days is safe and well tolerated with predictable pharmacokinetics and demonstrated an observed clinical benefit in the treatment of COVID-19-related hypoxemia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04573322)

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.7%
3
New England Journal of Medicine
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
5
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
7
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
10
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
18
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
20
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
Pediatric Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
30
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%