A Cross-sectional Comparison of Utilization of Medical Crowdfunding for Global Health
Siemens, A.; Rustja, S.; Doiron, C.; Siemens, D. R.
Show abstract
The online solicitation of public donations has become an important financing option for health care expenses, intensified by increasing costs and deficits of universal public systems (1). With growing internet access and success of the largest social crowdfunding platform, GoFundMe, online appeals for medical causes have grown significantly over the last decade in low-to high-income countries. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively describe the use of GoFundMe as a crowdfunding platform for global health initiatives given its supremacy in the social crowdfunding market. Three different cohorts (n=100 each) of online solicitation were examined as a cross-section comparing global health appeals to those for personal health care and animal activism. Variables included the purpose for crowdfunding, the characteristics of beneficiaries and campaigns, and the factors associated with funding success. Our cross-sectional review found that global health campaigns were focused on voluntourism opportunities compared to more specific, individualized appeals for those in need. Global health campaigns appeared to be the least ambitious and generally the least successful of those reviewed. Grouping the most and least successful campaigns between the different cohorts, global health appears to be more successful when targeting a larger population to donate smaller amounts of money and relying on sharing via social media. We suggest that compared to online solicitation for personal health and animal activism objectives, crowdfunding on GoFundMe has unrealized potential as a tool for global health initiatives. More work should be conducted using different crowdfunding platforms and a more longitudinal review in order to expand on these findings and their implications on health care provision in the countries examined. Furthermore, future inquiry is needed to understand the social and ethical implications of online solicitation for global health endeavors in order to inform policy and promote discussion around equity and accessibility.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and conspiracy beliefs in Togo: Findings from two cross-sectional surveys 91%
- How do local-level authorities engage in epidemic and pandemic preparedness activities and coordinate with higher levels of government? Survey results from 33 cities 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Pandemic Journaling Project: A new dataset of first-person accounts of the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Recommended distances for physical distancing during COVID-19 pandemics reveal cultural connections between countries 90%
- Integrating digital and field surveillance to complement efforts to manage epidemic diseases of livestock: African swine fever as a case study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vaccine confidence and timeliness of childhood immunisation by health information source, maternal, socioeconomic, and geographic characteristics in Albania 90%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 90%
- Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: A rapid review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Social Distancing Measures on COVID-19 Healthcare Demand in Central Texas 88%
- Retrospective mortality and prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in greater Omdurman, Sudan: a population–based cross–sectional survey 88%
- Proactive social distancing mitigates COVID-19 outbreaks within a month across 58 mainland China cities 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.