Back

Dalpiciclib and Pyrotinib Exert Synergistic Antitumor Effects in Triple Positive Breast Cancer

Bu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, N.; Bi, K.; Sun, L.; Qiao, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Wang, D.; Ma, Q.; Li, H.; Liu, C.

2021-10-04 cell biology
10.1101/2021.10.04.463019 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe therapeutic benefit of the standard combination of anti-HER2 and chemotherapy in triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) is limited even after the addition of endocrine therapy to the regimen. Therefore, treatment optimization is required urgently. MethodsThrough the drug sensitivity test, the drug combination efficacy of anti-HER2 drug, endocrine drug and CDK4/6 inhibitor to BT474 cells were tested. The underlying molecular mechanisms were investigated using immunofluorescence, western blot analysis, immunohistochemical staining and cell cycle analysis. Potential biomarker which may indicate the responsiveness to drug treatment in triple positive breast cancer was selected out using RNA-sequence and tested using immunohistochemical staining. ResultsWe found that pyrotinib combined with dalpiciclib showed better efficacy than pyrotinib combined with tamoxifen in BT474 cells. Degradation of HER2 could enhance ER nuclear transportation, whereas cell cycle blockers could reverse this process. This may be the underlying mechanism by which the addition of dalpiciclib was more beneficial than the addition of pyrotinib plus tamoxifen. Furthermore, CALML5 was revealed to be a potential indicator of responsiveness to anti-HER2 therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibition in triple positive breast cancer. ConclusionOur study provided evidence for the introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitor in the treatment of TPBC and indicated that the combination of anti-HER2 therapy and cell cycle blockers may be a better strategy for TPBC treatment. FundingThis study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#U20A20381, #81872159)

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.