Back

Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and pandemic

Galanis, P. A.; Vraka, I.; Siskou, O.; Konstantakopoulou, O.; Katsiroumpa, A.; Moisoglou, I.; Kaitelidou, D.

2021-10-03 public and global health
10.1101/2021.09.30.21264344 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAccurate measurement of individuals attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and pandemic is critical to understand the way that people respond during a major crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. ObjectiveTo develop and validate a questionnaire to assess attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and pandemic. MethodsWe performed a reliability and validity study in a sample of the general population in Greece. Data were collected online through social media between 15 August and 7 September 2021. Thus, a convenience sample was obtained. Reliability and validity of the questionnaire were assessed with a Delphi study, an exploratory factor analysis, and a test-retest study. Also, we calculated Cronbachs coefficient alpha for the factors that emerged from the exploratory factor analysis. ResultsThe final study included 1959 adults from the general population in Greece. Our four-factor model explained 73% of the variance and confirmed out initial hypothesis regarding the factors of the questionnaire. In particular, we found the following four factors: (a) fear against the COVID-19 (five items), (b) information regarding the COVID-19 (two items), (c) compliance with hygiene measures (two items), and (d) trust in COVID-19 vaccination (seven items). Cronbachs coefficients alpha for the four factors that emerged from the exploratory factor analysis were greater than 0.82. Pearsons correlation coefficients for the 16 items and the four factors were greater than 0.67 (p-value<0.001 in all cases). ConclusionsWe developed a reliable and valid questionnaire to measure attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and pandemic. Further studies should be conducted to expand our knowledge and infer more valid results.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.8%
2
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.5%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
8
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
9
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
13
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
19
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%