Back

Assessing the role of fungal diversity in decomposition: A meta-analysis

Drost, S. M.; van der Wal, A.; de Boer, W.; Bodelier, P. L.

2021-09-29 microbiology
10.1101/2021.09.29.462096 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fungi play an important role in carbon - and nutrient cycling. It is, however, unclear if diversity of fungi is essential to fulfill this role. With this meta-analysis, we aim to understand the relationship between fungal diversity and decomposition of plant materials (leaf litter and wood) in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The selection criteria for papers were the presence of a fungal diversity gradient and quantification of decomposition as mass loss. In total 40 papers met the selection criteria. We hypothesized that increase of fungal species will result in stronger decomposition, especially in species poor communities. Both artificial inoculated and naturally assembled fungal communities were included in the analysis in order to assess whether manipulated experiments are representative for field situations. We found a significant positive effect of increased fungal diversity on decomposition. However, in manipulated experiments this relationship was only positive when a control treatment of one fungus was compared with multispecies communities. This relationship became negative when comparisons of higher initial richness (at least two fungal species as "control") were included. In contrast, under natural field conditions increased fungal diversity coincided with increased decomposition. This suggests that manipulated experiments are not representative for field situations. Possible reasons for this are discussed. Yet, both in manipulated and field experiments, environmental factors can influence diversity - decomposition relationships as indicated by a negative relationship of increasing C:N ratio on the effect of fungal diversity on decomposition. Overall, our results show that fungal diversity can have an important role in decomposition, but that design of experiments (manipulated or field) and quality of the plant material should be taken into account for interpretation of this diversity-functioning relationship.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.1%
2
Fungal Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
6
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Phytobiomes Journal
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Applied Soil Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Journal of Fungi
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
FEMS Microbiology Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%
29
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
30
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%