Back

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA antibodies in COVID-19 convalescent plasma do not facilitate antibody-dependent enhance of viral infection.

Clark, N. M.; Janaka, S. K.; Hartman, W.; Stramer, S.; Goodhue, E.; Weiss, J.; Evans, D. T.; Connor, J. P.

2021-09-16 immunology
10.1101/2021.09.14.460394 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2, which causes COVID-19, has resulted in the death of nearly 4 million people within the last 18 months. While preventive vaccination and monoclonal antibody therapies have been rapidly developed and deployed, early in the pandemic the use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was a common means of passive immunization, with the theoretical risk of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of viral infection remaining undetermined. Though vaccines elicit a strong and protective immune response, and transfusion of CCP with high titers of neutralization activity are correlated with better clinical outcomes, the question of whether antibodies in CCP can enhance infection of SARS-CoV2 has not been directly addressed. In this study, we analyzed for and observed passive transfer of neutralization activity with CCP transfusion. Furthermore, to specifically understand if antibodies against the spike protein (S) enhance infection, we measured the anti-S IgG, IgA, and IgM responses and adapted retroviral-pseudotypes to measure virus neutralization with target cells expressing the ACE2 virus receptor and the Fc alpha receptor (FcR) or Fc gamma receptor IIA (Fc{gamma}RIIA). Whereas neutralizing activity of CCP correlated best with higher titers of anti-S IgG antibodies, the neutralizing titer was not affected when Fc receptors were present on target cells. These observations support the absence of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (ADE) by IgG and IgA isotypes found in CCP. The results presented, therefore, support the clinical use of currently available antibody-based treatment including the continued study of CCP transfusion strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
3
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical & Translational Immunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
9
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
15
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
19
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
27
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%