Back

Capturing population differences in rates of vascular aging using a deep learning electrocardiogram algorithm: a cross-sectional study

Diez Benavente, E.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; Iakunchykova, O.; Malyutina, S.; Kudryavstev, A.; Ryabikov, A.; Friedman, P. A.; Kapa, S.; Perel, P.; Wilsgaard, T.; Schirmer, H.; Clark, T. G.; Attia, Z. I.; Leon, D. A.

2021-09-14 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2021.09.09.21263337 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiovascular event rates increase with age in all populations. This is thought to be the result of multiple underlying molecular and cellular processes that lead to cumulative vascular damage. Apart from arterial stiffness based on pulse wave velocity there are few other non-invasive measures of this process of vascular aging. We have developed a potential biomarker of vascular aging using deep-learning to predict age from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). The difference between ECG predicted and chronological age ({delta}-age) can be interpreted as a measure of vascular aging. MethodsWe use data collected in two cross-sectional studies of adults aged 40-69 years in Norway and Russia to test the hypothesis that mean levels of {delta}-age, derived from a deep-learning model trained on a US population, correspond to the known large differences in cardiovascular mortality between the two countries. FindingsSubstantial differences were found in mean {delta}-age between populations: Russia-USA (+5{middle dot}2 years; 0{middle dot}7, 10 IQR) and Norway-USA (-2{middle dot}6 years; -7, 2 IQR). These differences were only marginally explained when accounting for differences in established cardiovascular disease risk factors. Interpretation{delta}-age may be an important biomarker of fundamental differences in cardiovascular disease risk between populations as well as between individuals.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.