Capturing population differences in rates of vascular aging using a deep learning electrocardiogram algorithm: a cross-sectional study
Diez Benavente, E.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; Iakunchykova, O.; Malyutina, S.; Kudryavstev, A.; Ryabikov, A.; Friedman, P. A.; Kapa, S.; Perel, P.; Wilsgaard, T.; Schirmer, H.; Clark, T. G.; Attia, Z. I.; Leon, D. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundCardiovascular event rates increase with age in all populations. This is thought to be the result of multiple underlying molecular and cellular processes that lead to cumulative vascular damage. Apart from arterial stiffness based on pulse wave velocity there are few other non-invasive measures of this process of vascular aging. We have developed a potential biomarker of vascular aging using deep-learning to predict age from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). The difference between ECG predicted and chronological age ({delta}-age) can be interpreted as a measure of vascular aging. MethodsWe use data collected in two cross-sectional studies of adults aged 40-69 years in Norway and Russia to test the hypothesis that mean levels of {delta}-age, derived from a deep-learning model trained on a US population, correspond to the known large differences in cardiovascular mortality between the two countries. FindingsSubstantial differences were found in mean {delta}-age between populations: Russia-USA (+5{middle dot}2 years; 0{middle dot}7, 10 IQR) and Norway-USA (-2{middle dot}6 years; -7, 2 IQR). These differences were only marginally explained when accounting for differences in established cardiovascular disease risk factors. Interpretation{delta}-age may be an important biomarker of fundamental differences in cardiovascular disease risk between populations as well as between individuals.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Olfactory impairment and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in older adults 94%
- Walking pace optimizes conventional cardiovascular disease risk prediction models among vulnerable subpopulations: a prospective cohort study 94%
- Effects of Age and Sex on Systemic Inflammation and Cardiometabolic Function in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Body fat and human cardiovascular ageing 96%
- Development and validation of a risk prediction algorithm for high-risk populations combining genetic and conventional risk factors of cardiovascular disease 94%
- Longitudinal associations of sustained low or high income and income variability with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective population-based cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease performs well in individuals aged 70 years and older 95%
- Augmenting clinical risk prediction of cardiovascular disease through protein and epigenetic biomarkers 94%
- A Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Artery Disease Improves the Prediction of Early-Onset Myocardial Infarction and Mortality in Men 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advanced ECG heart age estimation applicable to both sinus and non-sinus rhythm associates with cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular morbidity, and survival 94%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 91%
- Using ECG Machine Learning for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in African American Men and Women: the Jackson Heart Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systolic Blood Pressure and Survival to Very Old Age. Results from the Women’s Health Initiative 95%
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 94%
- Mitochondrial DNA copy number and incident heart failure: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.