The Histological Diagnosis of Breast Cancer by Employing scale invariant ResNet 18 With Spatial Supervised Technique
Bukhari, S. U. K.; Syed, A.; Khalid, S. S.; SHAH, S. S. H.
Show abstract
BackgroundBreast cancer is one of the most prevalent cause of morbidity and mortality in women all over the world. Histopathological diagnosis is a vital component in the management of breast cancer. The application of artificial intelligence is yielding promising results for the better patient care. AimThe main aim of the present research project is to explore the potential of spatial supervised technique to develop scale invariant system for the histological diagnosis of breast cancer. Materials and MethodsThe anonymized images of hematoxylin and eosin stained section of the dataset, which has been acquired from the website. The slides were taken at different zoom (magnification) levels. Spatial supervised learning has been employed to make a scale invariant system. We used 400x and 40x to generate the results. For the 400x, we trained our network on a dataset of 200x,100x, and 40x images. The datasets were split into training and validation sets. The training set contained 80% digital slides of the respected dataset, and the validation set contained 20% digital slides of the respected dataset. The final result was generated by splitting the dataset of 400x into the training and test dataset. The training set contained 50% digital slides, and the test set also contained 50% digital slides. This unusual split is done to show how good spatial supervised learning works. Similarly, for 40x, we trained our networks on a dataset of 400x,200x, and 100x. The same steps were followed to obtain the 40x results. ResultsThe result analysis revealed that the ResNet 18 with spatial supervised learning on dataset of 40x yielded the F-1 score of 1.0, while ResNet 18 with supervised learning only, on dataset of 40x yielded F-1 score of 0.9823. ResNet 18 with spatial supervised learning on dataset of 400x revealed F-1 score of 0.9957, and ResNet 18 with supervised learning only, on dataset of 400x showed the F-1 score of 0.9591. For supervised learning dataset is spited into training (80%) and testing (20% of dataset). ConclusionThe analysis of digitized pathology images with the application of convolutional neural network Resnet -18 architecture with spatial supervised learning revealed excellent results, which is demonstrated by a very high F-1 score of 1.0. The development of scale invariant system with application of spatial supervised technique solved the problem of images with variable magnifications. The finding would further pave the pathway for application of deep learning for the histological diagnosis of pathological lesions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi- Stage Feature Selection (MSFS) Algorithm for UWB- Based Early Breast Cancer Size Prediction 97%
- Artificial intelligence tool for the study of COVID-19 microdroplet spread across the human diameter and airborne space 96%
- PRCnet: An Efficient Model for Automatic Detection of Brain Tumor in MRI Images 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 95%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 94%
- Identification of prognostic biomarkers for suppressing tumorigenesis and metastasis of Hepatocellular carcinoma through transcriptome analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- PDAC-ANN: an artificial neural network to predict Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma based on gene expression 94%
- Effectiveness of educational intervention on breast cancer knowledge and breast self-examination among female university students in Bangladesh: a pre-post quasi-experimental one group study 94%
- Inference of core needle biopsy whole slide images requiring definitive therapy for prostate cancer 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.