Ensemble model estimates of the global burden of measles morbidity and mortality from 2000 to 2019: a modeling study
Santos, H.; Eilertson, K.; Lambert, B.; Hauryski, S.; Patel, M.; Ferrari, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundMeasles remains a significant source of childhood morbidity and mortality worldwide. Two doses of measles containing vaccine are recommended for all children and delivered through a combination of routine and supplemental immunization activities. Uncertainty about the degree to which second dose opportunities reach previously unvaccinated children presents a challenge in the assessment of vaccination programs and the estimation of the global burden of measles disease and mortality. MethodsWe fit an ensemble of models that represent alternative assumptions about the degree to which second dose opportunities reach previously unvaccinated children to routine measles surveillance from 100 countries. Using maximum likelihood we selected the best fit model for each country. We compare the resulting estimates of the burden of measles disease and mortality to existing methods for estimating the burden of measles that assume that second dose opportunities are independent of receipt of the first dose. FindingsWe find that 78 of 100 countries are best-fit by a model that assumes that second doses that are delivered through supplemental campaigns are preferentially delivered to children who have received a first dose. Using a country-specific best-fit model we estimate that measles mortality has declined by 73% from 2000-2019 compared to an estimated decline of 83% using an assumption of independent doses in all countries. InterpretationDespite large decreases in measles cases over the last two decades, the observed trajectories in most countries suggest that supplemental immunization activities are disproportionately reaching previously vaccinated children. To accelerate measles reduction goals efforts to reach unvaccinated children through supplemental activities and second dose opportunities should be intensified. FundingBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, World Health Organization
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting immune protection against outcomes of infectious disease from population-level effectiveness data with application to COVID-19 94%
- Projecting the impact of a two-dose COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Ontario, Canada 94%
- Expected endpoints from future chikungunya vaccine trial sites informed by serological data and modeling 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating targeted COVID-19 vaccination strategies with agent-based modeling 94%
- Using Test Positivity and Reported Case Rates to Estimate State-Level COVID-19 Prevalence and Seroprevalence in the United States 93%
- Using real-time data to guide decision-making during an influenza pandemic: a modelling analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Potential health and economic impact of paediatric vaccination using next generation influenza vaccines in Kenya: a modelling study 95%
- When time-dependence in disease outcome risk is not captured by impact evaluation modeling studies: a measles vaccination case study 94%
- Global impact and cost-effectiveness of one-dose versus two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination schedules: a comparative modelling analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Alternative Infant and Neonatal Rotavirus Vaccination Schedules in Malawi 94%
- Modelling COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections in Highly Vaccinated Israel – the effects of waning immunity and third vaccination dose 94%
- Rural prioritization may increase the impact of COVID-19 vaccines in Sub-Saharan Africa due to ongoing internal migration: A modeling study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.