Back

Multi-task deep learning-based survival analysis on the prognosis of late AMD using the longitudinal data in AREDS

Ghahramani, G. C.; Brendel, M.; Lin, M.; Chen, Q.; Keenan, T.; Chen, K.; Chew, E.; Lu, Z.; PENG, Y.; Wang, F.

2021-09-03 ophthalmology
10.1101/2021.08.26.21262548 medRxiv
Show abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of vision loss. Some patients experience vision loss over a delayed timeframe, others at a rapid pace. Physicians analyze time-of-visit fundus photographs to predict patient risk of developing late-AMD, the most severe form of AMD. Our study hypothesizes that 1) incorporating historical data improves predictive strength of developing late-AMD and 2) state-of-the-art deep-learning techniques extract more predictive image features than clinicians do. We incorporate longitudinal data from the Age-Related Eye Disease Studies and deep-learning extracted image features in survival settings to predict development of late-AMD. To extract image features, we used multi-task learning frameworks to train convolutional neural networks. Our findings show 1) incorporating longitudinal data improves prediction of late-AMD for clinical standard features, but only the current visit is informative when using complex features and 2) "deep-features" are more informative than clinician derived features. We make codes publicly available at https://github.com/bionlplab/AMD_prognosis_amia2021.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
4
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
7
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
12
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
17
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
21
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%