Back

Intramuscular SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicit varying degrees of plasma and salivary antibody responses as compared to natural infection

Nahass, G. R.; Salomon-Shulman, R. E.; Blacker, G.; Haider, K.; Brotherton, R.; Teague, K.; Yiu, Y. Y.; Brewer, R. E.; Galloway, S. D.; Hansen, P.; Marquez-Arreguin, G.; Sheikh-Mohamed, S.; Chao, G. Y. C.; Isho, B.; Do, E.; Chang, I.; Snow, T.; Lee, A. S.; STANFORD COVID-19 BIOBANK, ; Manohar, M.; Yang, S.; Blomkalns, A. L.; Rogers, A. J.; McGeer, A.; Gingras, A.-C.; Straus, S.; Grant, P.; Nadeau, K. C.; Blish, C. A.; Gommerman, J. L.; Sanders, E. C.; Weissman, I. L.; Tal, M. C.

2021-08-30 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2021.08.22.21262168 medRxiv
Show abstract

Vaccination induced antibody and T-cell immune responses are important for systemic protection from COVID-19. Because SARS-CoV-2 infects and is transmitted by oral-pharyngeal mucosa, we wished to test mucosal antibodies elicited by natural infection or intramuscular vaccine injection. In a non-randomized observational study, we measured antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 RBD in plasma and saliva from convalescent or vaccinated individuals and tested their neutralizing potential using a replication competent rVSV-eGFP-SARS-CoV-2. We found IgG and IgA anti-RBD antibodies as well as neutralizing activity in convalescent plasma and saliva. Two doses of mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) induced high levels of IgG anti-RBD in saliva, a subset of whom also had IgA, and significant neutralizing activity. We detected anti-RBD IgG and IgA with significant neutralizing potential in the plasma of single dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccinated individuals, and we detected slight amounts of anti-RBD antibodies in matched saliva. The role of salivary antibodies in protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown and merits further investigation. This study was not designed to, nor did it study the full kinetics of the antibody response or protection from infection, nor did it address variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.