Back

Ambulatory Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Children: Cross-sectional Correlation between Function, Quantitative Muscle Ultrasound and MRI

Abdulhady, H.; Sakr, H. M.; Elsayed, N. S.; El-Sobky, T. A.; Fahmy, N.; Saadawy, A. M.; Elsedfy, H.

2021-08-24 neurology
10.1101/2021.08.17.21262119 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction/AimsDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive genetic muscle disease. Quantitative muscle ultrasound (MUS), muscle MRI, and functional tools are important to delineate characteristics of muscle involvement. We aimed to establish correlations between clinical/functional and above-named imaging tools respecting their diagnostic and prognostic role in DMD children. MethodsA Prognostic cross-sectional retrospective study of 27 steroid-naive, ambulant male children/adolescents with genetically-confirmed DMD (mean age, 8.8 {+/-} 3.3 years). Functional performance was assessed using motor function measure (MFM) which assess standing/transfer (D1), proximal (D2) and distal (D3) motor function. And six-minute-walk test (6MWT). Imaging evaluation included quantitative muscle MRI which measured muscle fat content in a specific location of right rectus femoris by mDixon sequence. Quantitative MUS measured muscle brightness in standardized US image as an indicator of muscle fat content. ResultsWe found a highly significant positive correlation between the mean MFM total score and 6MWT (R=0.537, P=0.007). And a highly significant negative correlation between fat content by MUS and MFM total score (R=-0.603, P=0.006) and its D1 subscore (R=-0.712, P=0.001). And a significant negative correlation between fat content by US and 6MWT (R=-0.529, P=0.02). And a significant positive correlation between muscle fat content by mDixon MRI and patients age (R=0.617, P=0.01). DiscussionQuantitative MUS correlates significantly with clinical/functional assessment tools as MFM and 6MWT, and augments their role in disease-tracking of DMD. Quantitative MUS has the potential to act as a substitute to functional assessment tools. The role for quantitative muscle MRI in disease-tracking should be further explored after elimination of confounding factors. Graphical abstractDivergent arrows represent negative correlations, while convergent the arrow represents a positive correlation. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=109 SRC="FIGDIR/small/21262119v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c40baborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1da4708org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16d6031org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c66a1d_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.0%
5
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
6
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
8
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Pain Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
19
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
22
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
25
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
27
Pediatric Neurology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
28
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%