Back

Older adults generalize their movements across walking contexts more than young during gradual and abrupt split-belt walking

Aucie, Y.; Harker, H. M.; Sombric, C.; Torres-Oviedo, G.

2021-08-08 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.08.06.455403 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Generalization of movements from experienced to novel situations is a critical aspect of motor learning. It has been demonstrated that the training period when a movement is learned influences the movements generalization to untrained situations. However, little is known about how healthy aging affects these processes. For example, young adults exhibit greater generalization of movements learned on a device (e.g. split-belt treadmill or robotic arm) to movements without it (e.g, overground walking or unconstrained reaching) when participants experience small vs. large perturbations on the training device. Here, we investigated whether a similar effect would be observed in older adults. To this end, we compared the generalization of split-belt adaptation to overground walking in older (75.9{+/-}4.8 years old) and young adults (24.7{+/-}5.9 years old) when adapted gradually (i.e., small perturbations) vs. abruptly (i.e., large perturbations). We found that both age groups adapted more to the abrupt condition compared to the gradual condition, which resulted in greater adaptation effects (i.e., aftereffects) on the treadmill in the abrupt than the gradual groups. We also found that older adults generalize more than young adults, regardless of the perturbation schedule (i.e., gradual or abrupt). Our results suggest that abrupt perturbations during adaptation do not limit the generalization of movement in older adults-perhaps because they are more likely to attribute them to their own faulty movements. These results suggest that large perturbations are better than small when training older clinical populations since abrupt disturbances would lead to more adaptation and generalization of corrected movements in older people.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
60.9%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
3
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
5
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
7
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
8
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
9
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
10
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
13
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
14
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
16
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%