Factorial Structure of the Transactional eHealth Literacy Among Vietnamese Youth: An Instrument Validation Study
Vu, G. T.; Vu, T. M. T.; van Kessel, R.; Wong, B. L. H.; Nguyen, T. T.; Nguyen, T. P. T.; Nguyen, S. H.; Do, H. N.; Tran, B. X.; Latkin, C. A.; Ho, C. S. H.; Ho, R. C. M.
Show abstract
The progression into the Digital Age has brought an array of novel skill requirements. Unlike traditional literacy, there are currently few measures that can reliably measure eHealth literacy. The Transactional Model of eHealth Literacy and subsequent Transactional eHealth Literacy Instrument may provide a feasible option for measuring eHealth literacy. However, this instrument has yet to be validated, which is the aim of this study. We conducted an online cross-sectional study among 236 Vietnamese young people. Using exploratory factor analysis, we ensured that a model consisting of four factors had the best fit (RMSEA = 0.116; CFI = 0.907) and the highest internal consistency (Cronbachs = 0.96). A confirmatory factor analysis tested measurement invariance at four levels: configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance. Only metric invariance was partially invariant, while the rest tested fully invariant. Even with partial metric invariance, there is reason to assume that functional, communicative, critical, and translational eHealth literacy (the four levels according to the transactional model) are consistently measured when deploying the Transactional eHealth Literacy Instrument across groups. In other words, this study suggests the instrument can be used for comparisons across groups and has the potential to generate high-quality data usable for informing change agents as to whether a particular population is proficient enough to adopt novel eHealth innovations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-Cultural Validation of Acculturation Measures: Expanding the East Asian Acculturation Framework for Global Applicability 97%
- Developing and validation of a questionnaire for assessment of individual's perceived risk of four major non-communicable diseases in Myanmar 95%
- Family Vulnerability Scale: evidence of content and internal structure validity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 95%
- ‘Kindness By Post’: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of A Participatory Public Mental Health Project 93%
- Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 94%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 93%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 93%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 93%
- Substantial SF-36 score differences according to the mode of administration of the questionnaire: an ancillary study of the SENTIPAT multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing web-based questionnaire self-completion and telephone interview 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the Impact of Digital Technology on the Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- How suitable are clinical vignettes for the evaluation of symptom checker apps? A test theoretical perspective 92%
- An online mental health informed physical activity intervention for emergency service workers and their families: A stepped-wedge trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.