Sex differences in the risk of cataract associated with type 2 diabetes: a Mendelian randomization study
Zhang, H.; Xiu, X.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, H.
Show abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a recognized risk factor for developing cataract. However, it is unclear if the shared genetic variance and potential genetic causal relationship between T2D and cataract are different for males and females. We evaluated sex-specific genetic correlation (rg) and putative genetic causality between the two diseases by using linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) and six Mendelian randomization (MR) approaches after leveraging large-scale population-based genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary of T2D and cataract. Application of LDSC found a significant genetic correlation between T2D and cataract in East Asian males (rg=0.68, 95% confident interval [CI]=0.17 to 1, p-value=8.60x10-3) but a non-significant genetic correlation in East Asian females (rg=0.25, CI= -0.02 to 0.52, p-value=8.38x10-2). MR analyses indicated a consistently stronger (paired t-test |t|=5.87, p-value=2.04x10-3) causal effect of T2D on cataract in East Asian males (liability OR=1.20 to 1.41, p-value=5.86x10-27 to 6.60x10-6) than in females (liability OR=1.12 to 1.21, p-value=2.02x10-14 to 1.82x10-2). In Europeans, the LDSC analysis suggested a close significant genetic correlation between the two diseases in males (rg=0.20, 95% confident interval [CI]=0.08 to 0.32, p-value=7.00x10-4) and females (rg=0.17, CI= 0.05 to 0.29, p-value=4.90x10-3); but the MR analyses provided weak evidences on a causal relationship between the two diseases in both sexes. These results presented the first evidence on sex difference of the casual relationship between cataract and T2D in East Asians, and supported a potential genetic heterogeneity of the shared genetics underlying T2D and cataract between East Asians and Europeans in both sexes.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The putative causal effect of type 2 diabetes in risk of cataract: a Mendelian randomization study in East Asian 95%
- Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer in Korean women 91%
- Clustered Mendelian Randomization analyses identifies distinct and opposing pathways in the causal association between insulin-like growth factor-1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multiethnic GWAS meta-analysis of 585,243 individuals identifies new risk loci associated with cataract and reveals sex-specific effects 94%
- AI-Enhanced Integration of Genetic and Medical Imaging Data for Risk Assessment of Type 2 Diabetes 93%
- Genetic Architecture and Risk Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in over 116,144 Chinese Pregnancies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association study of body fat distribution traits in Hispanics/Latinos from the HCHS/SOL Study 92%
- Evaluating and implementing block jackknife resampling Mendelian randomization to mitigate bias induced by overlapping samples 91%
- Imputed Gene Expression Risk Scores: A Functionally Informed Component of Polygenic Risk 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of imputation performance of multiple reference panels in a Pakistani population 92%
- Genetic analyses of inflammatory polyneuropathy and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy identified candidate genes 92%
- BinomiRare: A carriers-only test for association of rare genetic variants with a binary outcome for mixed models and any case-control proportion 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.