Back

The creation of functioning gastrojejunostomy following magnetic compression

qiao, w.; Lv, Y.; Du, Z.; Li, H.; Du, L.; Hu, H.; Li, D.

2021-08-04 physiology
10.1101/2021.08.04.455102 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMagnetic compression for creating gastrojejunostomy has many advantages according to previous studies. However, following mechanical device release after healing, the anastomotic stenosis becomes the pivotal point. MethodsRectangle-shaped magnets were used for magnetic compression in rabbits. Both paclitaxel-loaded magnets and a strategy of pyloric ligation were chosen to improve the gastrojejunostomy. Based on these choices, the half-capsule was applied to occlude the pylorus after anastomotic formation. The size and patency of the anastomoses were analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of these approaches. A histological examination was also performed. ResultsThe positive effect of ligating the pylorus on gastrojejunostomy was significantly greater than that achieved using paclitaxel-loaded magnets during either short- or long-term follow-up. There were fewer scar tissue and collagen fibers at the anastomotic site in the treatment group than in the control group. The anastomotic aperture was of great interest at 9 months after the ligation of the pylorus following magnetic compression. In the view of the jejunum, although the aperture was barely visible, gastric juice was continuously spilling through it like a spring, and the aperture was clearly visible from the stomach side. All half-capsules failed to block the pylorus. ConclusionThe effect of paclitaxel on maintaining gastrojejunostomy patency was temporary. The ligation of the pylorus ensured the long-term patency of gastrojejunostomy, and the aperture was comparable to the pylorus which could play an anti-reflux role. Further studies for the sort of gastrointestinal aperture are being planned.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.