Booster and anergic effects of the Covishield vaccine among healthcare workers in South India
Kannian, P.; Mahanathi, P.; Veeraraghavan, A.; Kumarasamy, N.
Show abstract
Covishield (same as ChAdOx1) vaccine was rolled out in January 2021 against SARS-CoV2 in India. Although studies show good efficacy after two doses, there is limited data on the fate of the elicited antibody responses over time in groups with or without prior exposure to SARS-CoV2. Therefore, in this study we proposed to test naive or previously exposed healthcare workers (HCWs) longitudinally after both doses for anti-SARS-CoV2 spike antibody (ASSA) levels. Serum samples were collected from 205 HCWs at days 14 and 28 after first dose, and at days 14, 28 and 3-months after second dose. ASSA levels were quantitated by ECLIA method. Non-responder rate was 17% (35/205) on day 14 and 2% (5/205) on day 28 after the first dose. After the second dose, the responder rate was 100%. Non-responder rate was significantly higher among males (p<0.00001) and senior citizens (p=0.008). The second dose boosted a 27-fold increase in the COVID-19 naive (CN) group, but caused a 1.5-fold decline in the previously exposed groups. By three months, the antibody levels declined 3-4-folds in all the groups. In spite of high antibody levels (GM-1007 U/ml) after the second dose, 14% developed mild breakthrough infections (BTI). The booster effect was significantly higher when given 10-14 weeks later. The responder rate for Covishield was 98% after first dose and 100% after second dose. The vaccine elicited a prime-boost effect in CN HCWs and a boost-anergy effect in the previously exposed HCWs. ASSA levels began to decline proportionately by three months.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies in vaccinated and vaccine naïve adult Nigerians 96%
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 96%
- Pulmonary function and comparative SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgG antibody response among the COVID-19 recovered group 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity after booster dose with AZD1222 via intradermal route among adult who had received CoronaVac 97%
- Immunogenicity of a third dose viral-vectored COVID-19 vaccine after receiving two-dose inactivated vaccines in healthy adults 96%
- A randomized clinical trial of a booster dose with low versus standard dose of AZD1222 in adult after 2 doses of inactivated vaccines 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and adverse events of priming with inactivated whole SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) followed by boosting the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine 97%
- COMPARATIVE IMMUNOGENICITY OF BNT162b2 mRNA VACCINE WITH NATURAL COVID-19 INFECTION 96%
- Systemic adverse effects induced by the BNT162b2 vaccine are associated with higher antibody titers from 3 to 6 months after vaccination 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is extremely vivacious in subjects with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
- Comprehensive genomic, immunological and clinical analysis of COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections: a prospective, comparative cohort study 95%
- Genomics of Post-Vaccination SARS-CoV-2 Infections During the Delta Dominated Second Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, from Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), India 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cellular and humoral immune response to a third dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine – a prospective observational study 95%
- BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Sputnik V vaccines induce comparable immune responses on a par with severe course of COVID-19 94%
- Safety and immunogenicity of GamEvac-Combi, a heterologous rVSV- and rAd5-vectored Ebola vaccine: a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial in the Republic of Guinea and Russia 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.