Predictors of COVID-19 vaccination uptake and reasons for decline of vaccination: a systematic review
Galanis, P. A.; Vraka, I.; Siskou, O.; Konstantakopoulou, O.; Katsiroumpa, A.; Kaitelidou, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundVarious COVID-19 vaccines with proven safety and effectiveness are available now but vaccine hesitancy remains a public threat. COVID-19 vaccines uptake appears to have an essential role in the successful control of the COVID-19 pandemic. ObjectiveTo examine predictors of COVID-19 vaccination uptake and reasons for decline of vaccination. MethodsWe followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines for this systematic review. We searched Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, CINAHL, and a pre-print service (medRxiv) from inception to July 12, 2021. We used the following key-words: vaccin*, COVID-19, and uptake. We included all types of studies (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods) reporting COVID-19 vaccination uptake. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021267460). ResultsTwelve studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. COVID-19 vaccination uptake ranged from 28.6% to 98% in the general population, while among healthcare workers ranged from 33.3% to 94.5%, and among patients ranged from 36% to 80%. The main predictors of COVID-19 vaccination uptake were male gender, white race, older age, higher socioeconomic status, higher self-perceived COVID-19 vulnerability, increased information about COVID-19 vaccines, and chronic illness. The most important reasons for decline of vaccination were concerns about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, illness, medication, pregnancy, fertility, breastfeeding, religious reasons, ethical reasons, previous COVID-19 diagnosis, self-estimation that COVID-19 is not a severe disease, and limited knowledge about the vaccines. ConclusionsSeveral factors affect COVID-19 vaccination uptake, while various reasons affect peoples decision to refuse to take a COVID-19 vaccine. These findings are essential to further enhance our understanding of COVID-19 vaccination uptake and design specific interventions. Given the high prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, our findings have major implications for the delivery of COVID-19 vaccination programmes in the public with special attention to people who are undecided or unlikely to take a COVID-19 vaccine.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Engagement in Algeria: A Population-based Study with Systematic Review of Studies from Arab Countries of the MENA Region 95%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Perceptions And Differences By Sex, Age, And Education: Findings From A Cross-Sectional Assessment Of 1367 Community Adults In Ontario 95%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vaccination or restriction?: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and vaccine passports 95%
- Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications in Australia 94%
- Community Engagement to support COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: A living systematic review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Senegal: a mixed study 94%
- Reasons underlying the intention to vaccinate children aged 5-11 against COVID-19: A cross-sectional study of parents in Israel, November 2021 94%
- Factors Associated with the Acceptance and Willingness of COVID-19 Vaccination among Chinese Healthcare Workers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Parental attitudes towards mandatory vaccination; a systematic review 94%
- Public opinion on global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines: evidence from two nationally representative surveys in Germany and the United States 94%
- Trends, patterns and psychological influences on COVID-19 vaccination intention: findings from a large prospective community cohort study in England and Wales (Virus Watch) 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.