Back

Deep Learning Image Classification of Red Blood Cell Deformability

Lamoureux, E. S.; Islamzada, E.; Wiens, M. V. J.; Matthews, K.; Duffy, S. P.; Ma, H.

2021-07-27 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.07.26.453886 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Red blood cells (RBCs) must be highly deformable to transit through the microvasculature to deliver oxygen to tissues. The loss of RBC deformability resulting from pathology, natural aging, or storage in blood bags can impede the proper function of these cells. A variety of methods have been developed to measure RBC deformability, but these methods require specialized equipment, long measurement time, and highly skilled personnel. To address this challenge, we investigated whether a machine learning approach could be applied to determine donor RBC deformability using single cell microscope images. We used the microfluidic ratchet device to sort RBCs based on deformability. Sorted cells are then imaged and used to train a deep learning model to classify RBCs based on deformability. This model correctly predicted deformability of individual RBCs with 84 {+/-} 11% accuracy averaged across ten donors. Using this model to score the deformability of RBC samples were accurate to within 4.4 {+/-} 2.5% of the value obtained using the microfluidic ratchet device. While machine learning methods are frequently developed to automate human image analysis, our study is remarkable in showing that deep learning of single cell microscopy images could be used to measure RBC deformability, a property not normally measurable by imaging. Measuring RBC deformability by imaging is also desirable because it can be performed rapidly using a standard microscopy system, potentially enabling RBC deformability studies to be performed as part of routine clinical assessments.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
4
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
17
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%