Doxycycline is a safe alternative to Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin to prevent clinical worsening and hospitalization in mild COVID-19 patients: An open label randomized clinical trial (DOXYCOV)
Sobngwi, E.; Zemsi, S.; Guewo-Fokeng, M.; Katte, J. C.; Kouanfack, C.; Mfeukeu-Kuate, L.; Zemsi, A.; Wasnyo, Y.; Assiga-Ntsama, A.; Ndi-Manga, J. A.; Tambekou, J. S.; Ngatchou, W.; Moussi-Omgba, C.; Mbanya, J.-C.; Ongolo-Zogo, P.; Fouda, P.-J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of a doxycycline-based regimen against the national standard guidelines (Hydroxychloroquine plus Azithromycin) for the treatment of mild symptomatic COVID-19. MethodsWe conducted an open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial, in Cameroon comparing Doxycycline 100mg, twice daily for 7 days versus Hydroxychloroquine, 400 mg daily for 5 days and Azithromycin 500mg at day 1 and 250mg from day 2 through 5, in mild COVID-19 patients. Clinical improvement, biological parameters and adverse events were assessed. The primary outcome was the proportion of clinical cure at day 3, 10 and 30. Non-inferiority was determined by the clinical cure rate between protocols with a 20 percentage points margin. Results194 participants underwent randomization and were treated with Doxycycline (n=97) or Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin (n=97). At day 3, 74/92 (80.4%) participants on Doxycycline versus 77/95 (81.1%) on Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin -based protocols were asymptomatic (p=0.91). At day 10, 88/92 (95.7%) participants on Doxycycline versus 93/95 (97.9%) on Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin were asymptomatic (p=0.44). At day 30 all participants were asymptomatic. SARS-CoV2 PCR was negative at Day 10 in 60/92 (65.2%) participants allocated to Doxycycline and 63/95 (66.3%) participants allocated to Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin. None of the participants were admitted for worsening of the disease after treatment initiation. ConclusionDoxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days is as effective and safe as Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin, for preventing clinical worsening of mild symptomatic or asymptomatic COVID-19, and achieving virological suppression. Strengths and Limitations[tpltrtarr] This study is one of the first randomized trial, assessing the efficacy and tolerance of Doxycycline to treat COVID-19 [tpltrtarr]It is one of the first to evaluate disease progression and need to hospitalization in mild or asymptomatic COVID-19 [tpltrtarr]Patients will not receive identical treatments [tpltrtarr]Doxycycline has advantages in terms of availability, safety and cost compared to Hydroxychloroquine and Azytromycin [tpltrtarr]Though this study has encounter 7 lost to follow-up, this does not have a major influence on our results [tpltrtarr]These data will assist clinicians in their daily practice, and provide a new tool for the fight against COVID-19
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Doxycycline for the prevention of progression of COVID-19 to severe disease requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission: a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group trial (DOXPREVENT.ICU) 95%
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- No evidence of clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection with oxygen requirement: results of a study using routinely collected data to emulate a target trial 94%
- Prophylaxis for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis 92%
- Convalescent plasma in the management of moderate COVID-19 in India: An open-label parallel-arm phase II multicentre randomized controlled trial (PLACID Trial) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 92%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 91%
- Azithromycin mass drug administration to reduce child mortality in Niger (AVENIR II): a master protocol for a cluster-randomized adaptive platform trial to evaluate community-based health interventions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of therapeutic efficacy studies in Visceral Leishmaniasis: A systematic review of published reports, 2000-2021 94%
- Early Treatment with Fluvoxamine Among Patients with COVID-19: A Cost-Consequence Model 94%
- Comparing azithromycin to amoxicillin in the management of uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition in Burkina Faso: a pilot randomized trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 95%
- Macrolide and non-macrolide resistance after 36 months of mass azithromycin distribution in Burkina Faso: A cluster randomized trial 94%
- Real-World Effectiveness Of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir On COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Prevention: A Population-Based Cohort Study In The Province Of Québec, Canada 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.